MRS Meetings and Events

 

MT01.09.13 2024 MRS Spring Meeting

Differentiable Gaussian Process Force Constants

When and Where

Apr 25, 2024
5:00pm - 7:00pm

Flex Hall C, Level 2, Summit

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Keerati Keeratikarn1,Jarvist Frost1

Imperial College London1

Abstract

Keerati Keeratikarn1,Jarvist Frost1

Imperial College London1
The finite temperature properties of matter requires understanding thermal motion. In crystals this<br/>can be described by representing the collective excitation of the centre of mass motion as a phonon.<br/>Phonon frequencies (Energies) in the harmonic approximation come from the second order force con-<br/>stants (FC) of the potential energy surface (PES). The standard approach is to use a finite displacement<br/>method (FDM). Anharmonic contributions (required for finite thermal conductivity) require higher order<br/>force constants. FDM-based calculations scale poorly both with the size of the system, and the order of<br/>the force constants[1]. As an alternative approach, we can use a more sophisticated surrogate potential<br/>energy surface model [2].<br/>Gaussian processes (GPs) are a supervised machine learning method which can describe an arbitrary<br/>function. GPs are naturally Bayesian (probabilistic). Our reference data is the electronic structure from<br/>which conditions the model (training) [3, 4].<br/>Due to the underlying Gaussian form of a GP, the model is infinitely differentiable [5, 6]. This allows<br/>the model to be trained directly on forces (the derivative of energy), reducing the number of calculations<br/>required for a given accuracy of PES evaluation [7-9]. This differentiation can be extended to compute<br/>the second and the third derivative of PESs (harmonics and cubic anharmonic FCs) by using automatic<br/>differentiation (AD). By performing linear operations between arbitrary derivative orders of the GP, the<br/>covariance functions among PESs, forces and those FCs can be calculated.<br/>We implement this method in the Julia language, in our GPFC.jl package. We first use our tech-<br/>nique of anharmonic property calculations of Si, NaCl and PbTe which their atomic environments are<br/>represented on atomic Cartesian coordinates. To impose their space group symmetry, phonon coordinate<br/>representations are then used to describe the environment of these three materials resulting in faster con-<br/>vergence of anharmonic properties. To further impose a three-dimensional rotation symmetry, we aim to<br/>use an SO(3) representation (such as spherical harmonics) with our GP method to achieve accurate FCs<br/>with less data [3, 10]. We compare our results to standard approach of FDM (in Phono(3)py.py) [2]<br/>and cluster expansion (HiPhive.py) [11].<br/>References<br/>[1] A. Togo, L. Chaput and I. Tanaka, Distributions of phonon lifetimes in brillouin zones, Physical Review B 91 (2015) .<br/>[2] A. Togo et al., Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 35 (2023) 353001.<br/>[3] A.P. Bartók et al., Gaussian approximation potentials: A brief tutorial introduction, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 115 (2015) 1051.<br/>[4] H. Sugisawa et al., Gaussian process model of 51-dimensional potential energy surface for protonated imidazole dimer, The Journal of Chemical Physics 153 (2020) 114101.<br/>[5] E. Solak et al., Derivative observations in Gaussian Process Models of Dynamic Systems, NIPS’02: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2002) 8.<br/>[6] A. McHutchon, Differentiating Gaussian Processes.<br/>[7] E. Garijo del Río et al., Local Bayesian optimizer for atomic structures, Physical Review B 100 (2019) 104103.<br/>[8] S. Kaappa et al., Global optimization of atomic structures with gradient-enhanced gaussian process regression, Physical Review B 103 (2021) .<br/>[9] K. Asnaashari et al., Gradient domain machine learning with composite kernels: improving the accuracy of PES and force fields for large molecules, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 3 (2021) 015005.<br/>[10] V.L. Deringer et al., Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules, Chemical Reviews 121 (2021) 10073.<br/>[11] F. Eriksson et al., The hiphive package for the extraction of high-order force constants by machine learning, Advanced Theory and Simulations 2 (2019) .

Keywords

thermal conductivity

Symposium Organizers

Raymundo Arroyave, Texas A&M Univ
Elif Ertekin, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rodrigo Freitas, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Aditi Krishnapriyan, UC Berkeley

Session Chairs

Chris Bartel
Rodrigo Freitas
Sara Kadkhodaei
Wenhao Sun

In this Session

MT01.09.01
Rapid Discovery of Lightweight Cellular Crashworthy Solids for Battery Electric Vehicles using Artificial Intelligence and Finite Element Modeling

MT01.09.02
Chemical Environment Modeling Theory: Revolutionizing Machine Learning Force Field with Flexible Reference Points

MT01.09.03
A Self-Improvable Generative AI Platform for the Discovery of Solid Polymer Electrolytes with High Conductivity

MT01.09.04
Adaptive Loss Weighting for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

MT01.09.05
High-Accurate and -Efficient Potential for BCC Iron based on The Physically Informed Artificial Neural Networks

MT01.09.06
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of HF Etching of Amorphous Si3N4 Using Neural Network Potential

MT01.09.07
Deep Potential Model for Analyzing Enhancement of Lithium Dynamics at Ionic Liquid and Perovskite (BaTiO3) Interface

MT01.09.08
Autonomous AI generator for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials

MT01.09.09
Capturing The Lone Pair Interactions in BaSnF4 Using Machine Learning Potential

MT01.09.10
Benchmarking, Visualization and Hyperparameter Optimization of UF3 to Enhance Molecular Dynamics Simulations

View More »

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature