MRS Meetings and Events

 

SB05.09.22 2023 MRS Spring Meeting

Carbohydrates-Modified Pt(IV) Pro-Drugs -Conjugated Graphene Oxide as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Target Osteosarcoma

When and Where

Apr 12, 2023
5:00pm - 7:00pm

Moscone West, Level 1, Exhibit Hall

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Monica Montesi1,Giada Bassi1,2,Ludmila Zarska3,Eoin Moyinihan4,Arianna Rossi1,5,Andrea Ruffini1,Silvia Panseri1,Diego Montagner4,Vaclav Ranc3

Institute of Science, Technology and Sustainability for Ceramics (ISSMC) National Research Council1,University of Chieti2,Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University3,Maynooth University4,University of Messina5

Abstract

Monica Montesi1,Giada Bassi1,2,Ludmila Zarska3,Eoin Moyinihan4,Arianna Rossi1,5,Andrea Ruffini1,Silvia Panseri1,Diego Montagner4,Vaclav Ranc3

Institute of Science, Technology and Sustainability for Ceramics (ISSMC) National Research Council1,University of Chieti2,Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University3,Maynooth University4,University of Messina5
<b>INTRODUCTION</b><br/>Osteosarcoma is the most common type of bone cancer diagnosed especially in children and young adults<sup>1</sup>. A combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery is commonly used to treat this type of cancer<sup>2,3</sup>. In detail, chemotherapy is based on the use of molecules targeting the high cancer cell proliferation metabolism such as Platinum (Pt)-based drugs that binds nuclear DNA upon overpassing the cell membrane, causing its damage and the arrest of the cancer cell cycle at G2/M transition phase, leading to apoptosis<sup>4-7</sup>. Despite Pt chemotherapeutics are the most potent used anticancer drugs, their side effects (high degradation before entering the cells, the off-target organs toxicity, and cell resistance) remain great drawbacks<sup>8-11</sup>.<br/> <br/><b>EXPERIMENTAL METHODS</b><br/>In this study, we synthetized Graphene oxide (GO)-based nanoplatforms as smart delivery systems of Platinum-based drug. In order to reduce GO cytotoxicity in health cells while promoting its cellular uptake in cancer cells, and to allow Pt loading on GO, 8-arm polyethylene glycol-amine (PEG) was used. The bioactivity of GO-PEG-Pt platforms were compared to Pt-free (15 μM, 30 μM, and 60 μM) on three osteosarcoma cell lines (MG63, U2 and SAOS-2). The in vitro analysis of cellular uptake (ICP-OES), viability (MTT assay), morphology (actin and DAPI staining) and migration (scratch test) was performed.<br/> <br/><b>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</b><br/>A preliminary study showed that GO-PEG was not toxic for cells at any concentration tested compared to cells only. A significant cell viability reduction was detected at 30 μM GO-PEG-Pt for all cell lines compared to Pt-free, reaching 70% cell mortality in MG63 (p value ≤ 0.0001) and SAOS-2 (p value ≤ 0.001). Morphological analyses showed a round-shape cell morphology and cell number reduction in the presence of GO-PEG-Pt respect to Pt-free in a dose dependent trend. Cellular uptake of GO-PEG-Pt was significantly higher after 24h for SAOS (p value ≤ 0.05) and MG63 (p value ≤ 0.0001) cell lines than Pt-free. The cell migration was lower in Go-PEG-Pt than Pt-free in MG63 and U2 with overall more than 60% migration inhibition over time at 30 µM concentration.<br/> <br/><b>CONCLUSION</b><br/>The results confirmed that GO-PEG-Pt platforms work as promising anticancer delivery systems. In fact, all the three osteosarcoma cell lines showed higher susceptibility to GO-PEG-Pt in terms of lower metabolic activity and lower migration rates due to the higher GO-PEG-Pt uptake compared to Pt-free.<br/> <br/><b>REFERENCES</b><br/>1. Tang, Q.L. <i>et al.</i>, Cancer Lett., 113:121, 2011<br/>2. Xiao, X. <i>et al.,</i> J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 37:201, 2018<br/>3. World Health Organization – Cancer, 2021<br/>4. Hulvat MC., Cancer Incidence and Trends. Surg. Clin. North Am. W.B. Saunders, 2020<br/>5. Schirrmacher V., Int J Oncol., 54:407–19, 2019<br/>6. Johnstone TC, <i>et al.</i> Chem. Rev. American Chemical Society, 3436–86, 2016<br/>7. Gmeiner WH <i>et al.,</i> Nanotech. Rev., 3:111–22, 2014<br/>8. Bersini S, <i>et al.</i> J Biomaterials 35:2454–61, 2014<br/>9. Lei S <i>et al.,</i> Cancer Commun. 1–12, 2021<br/>10. Rajaratnam V. <i>et al.,</i> Cancers, 2020<br/>11. Ottaviani G. JN., Cancer Treat Res., 152:33, 2019<br/> <br/><b>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</b><br/>The authors would like to thank the Nano4Tarmed project (H2020-WIDESPREAD-2020-5, grant no: 952063) for providing financial support to this project.

Symposium Organizers

Gemma-Louise Davies, University College London
Anna Salvati, University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy
Sarah Stoll, Georgetown University
Xiaodi Su, Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, A*STAR

Symposium Support

Silver
Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Bronze
Matter, Cell Press

Session Chairs

Gemma-Louise Davies
Sarah Stoll

In this Session

SB01.03.13
4D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Highly Stretchable Uterine Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Controlled Release of Hormone

SB05.09.01
Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for the Electrochemical Quantification of Renin as a Marker of Tissue-Perfusion

SB05.09.02
Nanoplasmonic Immunoassay Based Integrated Microfluidic Device for In Situ PD-L1-Exosome Mediated Cell Communication Visualization and Analysis

SB05.09.03
Fluorogenic Immuno-Sensor Using Inverse Opal Hydrogel with Target Specific Aptamer Modification

SB05.09.05
Acoustic Anti-Cancer Therapy Using Nanoparticles

SB05.09.06
Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxicity of Varying Aspect Ratios of Gold Nanorods in HeLa Cells

SB05.09.07
Educational Stemsome Targeting and Destroying Pancreatic Tumor

SB05.09.08
Tumor-Activatable Tissue-Adhesive Chitosan Nanodepots for Site-Directed Treatment of Cancer

SB05.09.09
mRNA Encapsulated Ectosome-Liposome Hybrid for Anticancer Therapy

SB05.09.10
Mitochondria-Targetable Lysine-Based Biodegradable Nanogels Through Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Conversion

View More »

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature