MRS Meetings and Events

 

EN04.04.08 2023 MRS Spring Meeting

2D Shuttle Ti3C2Tx MXene Systems for Enhancing the Performance of Composite Cu2O/TiO2 Photocatalysts – Comparison with Graphene Oxide

When and Where

Apr 12, 2023
10:30am - 10:45am

Moscone West, Level 2, Room 2004

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Gilles Berhault1,Ziba Roostaei1,Frédéric Dappozze1,Chantal Guillard1

Research Institute on Catalysis and Environment1

Abstract

Gilles Berhault1,Ziba Roostaei1,Frédéric Dappozze1,Chantal Guillard1

Research Institute on Catalysis and Environment1
Introduction<br/> <br/>The most common semiconductor used in photocatalysis is titanium dioxide due to its high photocatalytic response under UV irradiation. However, the use of TiO<sub>2</sub> remains limited due to its high recombination rate of electron-hole pairs. Different strategies were envisaged to improve its photocatalytic response like cationic or anionic doping, coupling with C allotropes or changing semiconductor morphology. In this respect, previous studies made by our group showed that 1D TiO<sub>2</sub> nanotubes (TNT) provides a better separation of photogenerated charges while the coupling with graphene oxide (GO) allows transfer of photoelectrons to GO making more holes available for photooxidation reaction. However, GO was also found to be unstable when combined with TiO<sub>2</sub> under irradiation through overreduction of oxygen functional groups contained in graphene layers, leading to a complete loss of beneficial effect of adding GO after long photocatalytic runs.<br/>The solution envisaged here is to use a different 2D conductive material, MXene sheets (Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub>), to separate physically the semiconductor (TNT) producing photoelectrons from an electron-acceptor component (herein, copper) to improve both the photocatalytic response and the stability under irradiation conditions. Applications are envisaged for both photooxidation reactions and H<sub>2</sub> production.<br/> <br/>Materials and Methods<br/> <br/>Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene layers were obtained by HF etching of Ti<sub>3</sub>AlC<sub>2</sub> MAX precursors to remove aluminium. GO was synthesized according to a modified version of the Hummers method. TNT was obtained under hydrothermal alkaline conditions. Two series of impregnation are performed: first, GO or MXene were impregnated onto TNT while Cu(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>.3H<sub>2</sub>O was then impregnated onto the resulting materials. Photocatalytic tests were performed for the photodegradation of formic acid (FA) and for the H<sub>2</sub> production.<br/> <br/>Results and Discussion<br/> <br/>To define the role played by Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene layers, several systems combining the TiO<sub>2</sub> semiconductor (TNT as compared to the P25 reference) with Cu and/or MXene were considered.<br/>In the case of Cu doping of TiO<sub>2</sub>, the formation of Cu<sub>2</sub>O species with well-defined plasmonic properties was evidenced after adequate post-calcination treatment leading to improved photocatalytic activity for both photooxidation and H<sub>2</sub> production.<br/>Adding Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene to TiO<sub>2</sub> semiconductors (TNT or TiO<sub>2</sub> P25) was also studied considering several parameters (the MXene loading, the HF concentration during etching or the size of the MXene sheets) showing that an optimized choice of Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene layers with adequate sheet size and appropriate etching can lead to high beneficial gain in activity.<br/>In a last step, combining copper to the hybrid Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene/TiO<sub>2</sub> system allows an even more efficient separation of charges by beneficiating from the electric conductivity of the MXene layers to transport photoelectrons from the semiconductor to the Cu component with an activity twice higher than without MXene. This last result confirms the beneficial role played by Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene as a physical separator between donor and acceptor of electrons allowing a better separation of photogenerated charges.<br/>Finally, comparison to the use of GO instead of Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene layers confirms the interest of both systems with their own advantages: higher stability of MXene layers under photocatalytic conditions but better flexibility of GO favoring a higher interaction with each other component.<br/> <br/>Conclusion<br/> <br/>The interest of using a physical separator between donors and acceptors of photoelectrons has been demonstrated using Ti<sub>3</sub>C<sub>2</sub>T<sub>x</sub> MXene layers as 2D shuttle conductive materials. The physical separation achieved between holes and electrons leads to more active photocatalytic systems for both photooxidation reactions and H<sub>2</sub> production opening the possibility to form a vast family of new, more efficient and more stable photocatalytic hybrid systems.

Keywords

2D materials | graphene

Symposium Organizers

Hong Li, Nanyang Technological University
Damien Voiry, University of Montpellier
Zongyou Yin, The Australian National University
Xiaolin Zheng, Stanford University

Symposium Support

Bronze
ChemComm

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature