MRS Meetings and Events

 

SB01.03.09 2023 MRS Fall Meeting

The Impact of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on Keratinocyte Proliferation and Differentiation

When and Where

Nov 28, 2023
8:00pm - 10:00pm

Hynes, Level 1, Hall A

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Derek Zhang1,Ashley Huang2,Shi Fu3,Marcia Simon3,Miriam Rafailovich3,Dina McGinley4,Alice Shih3

The Wheatley School1,Syosset High School2,Stony Brook University, The State University of New York3,State University of New York at Farmingdale4

Abstract

Derek Zhang1,Ashley Huang2,Shi Fu3,Marcia Simon3,Miriam Rafailovich3,Dina McGinley4,Alice Shih3

The Wheatley School1,Syosset High School2,Stony Brook University, The State University of New York3,State University of New York at Farmingdale4
TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles are still widely used as food additives in the United States for their whitening properties, UV absorption capabilities, and their potential usage as antibacterial reagents. In fact, these particles are considered valid organic additives and can be incorporated at concentrations as high as 1%. When ingested these particles can circulate in the body coming in contact with viable cells and the long term impacts of TiO<sub>2</sub> build up is currently of concern for the European Food Safety Authority [1]. Additionally, even though nanoparticles may not penetrate the stratum corneum and hence do not come into direct contact with viable keratinocytes, if they are used in wound care treatments, they can come into direct contact with viable epidermal and dermal cells and influence cell function and tissue healing. In early experiments producing skin equivalents with keratinocytes exposed to 0.8 mg/mL rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles, we observed nanoparticle aggregation with premature stratum corneum formation and aberrant expression of filaggrin, a late stage multifunctional differentiation marker.<br/>Keratinocytes were grown with lethally irradiated 3T3 cells [2] with media modifications previously described [3]. At 70% confluence feeder cells were removed and cultures were treated with rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> (0.4 mg/mL); no TiO<sub>2</sub> cultures served as control. After 24 hours cultures were rinsed twice with Ca and Mg free phosphate buffered saline, resuspended in buffered saline with BSA and cells sorted at the Stony Brook University Flow Cytometry Core Facility using a FACS Aria IIIU cell sorter.<br/>Cells associated with TiO<sub>2</sub> were separated from TiO<sub>2</sub>-free cells based on side scatter using flow cytometry; cells showing low and high side scatter were collected. In these cultures, 90% of the cells exhibited low side scatter, consistent with the absence of nanoparticles. This compares with a low and high scatter population of 57.2% and 42.8%, respectively, in the TiO<sub>2</sub> treated cultures.<br/>The impact of 0.4 mg/mL TiO<sub>2</sub> on keratinocyte proliferative capacity was also explored as a function of colony forming efficiency (CFE), and the colony forming efficiency of keratinocytes with low and high side scatter was determined; TiO<sub>2</sub>-free keratinocyte cultures served as control [4]. 12 culture dishes containing 1000 cells each were plated: 4 control plates (low side scatter), 4 plates of TiO<sub>2</sub> treated high side scatter, and 4 plates of TiO<sub>2</sub> treated low side scatter. Following 12 days of incubation, each culture dish was rinsed with Ca and Mg free phosphate buffered saline and stained with Rhodamine B. Colonies ≥ 1 mm were counted. In these cultures, CFEs are about three-fold lower in the high side scatter population suggesting NP inhibition of plating efficiency or proliferation. To assess the full impact of these NPs in this system and in skin equivalents, ongoing work includes SEM analyses to determine NP location within the cell and differentiation assessment by RT-PCR to determine overall skin development.<br/><br/><br/>[1] Flavourings, Younes, M., Aquilina, G., Castle, L., Engel, K., Fowler, P., Fernandez, M. J. F., Fürst, P., Gundert-Remy, U., Gürtler, R., Husøy, T., Manco, M., Mennes, W., Moldeus, P., Passamonti, S., Shah, R., Waalkens Berendsen, I., Wölfle, D., Corsini, E., . . . Wright, M. (2021). EFSA Journal, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6585<br/>[2] Rheinwald, J. G., & Green, H. (1975). Cell, 6(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(75)80001-8<br/>[3] Randolph, R. K., & Simon, M. (1993). The Journal of biological chemistry, 268(13), 9198–9205.<br/>[4] Barrandon, Y., & Green, H. (1987). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84(8), 2302–2306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.8.2302

Keywords

additives | nanoscale

Symposium Organizers

Leila Deravi, Northeastern University
Francisco Martin-Martinez, Swansea University
Varsha Rao, University of Colorado Boulder
Bianca Datta, Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature