MRS Meetings and Events

 

CH01.13.01 2022 MRS Spring Meeting

Simulating Electron-Excited Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectra with the NIST DTSA-II Open-Source Software Platform

When and Where

May 23, 2022
8:00am - 8:15am

CH01-Virtual

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Dale Newbury1,Nicholas Ritchie1

National Institute of Standards and Technology1

Abstract

Dale Newbury1,Nicholas Ritchie1

National Institute of Standards and Technology1
Spatially-resolved elemental analysis by electron-excited X-ray excitation is a critical measurement capability for materials science applications<sup>1</sup>. “NIST DTSA-II” is an open-source comprehensive software platform that supports many aspects of electron-excited X-ray microanalysis with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), including performing accurate standards-based quantitative analysis with matrix corrections<sup>2-4</sup>. NIST DTSA-II includes a Monte Carlo electron trajectory simulation tool that enables “first principles” calculation of EDS spectra with user-specified composition and measurement conditions for a variety of target geometries (flat bulk material; vertical interface between two bulk materials; thin film on bulk; free-standing particles of various shapes (e.g., sphere, cube, cylinder; pyramid); inclusion embedded in a bulk matrix). The Monte Carlo simulation provides an absolute estimate of the characteristic and continuum (bremsstrahlung) X-ray intensity received by the detector based on the user-specified electron dose (beam current and detector acquisition time) and the EDS detector parameters (solid angle of acceptance; window transmission as a function of photon energy as calculated from the specified detector and window materials). Comparisons of intensities of measured and simulated EDS spectra for pure elements and multi-element standards (e.g., NIST Standard Reference Materials) show general agreement within ±25% for characteristic and continuum photon energies &gt; 1 keV. The simulated EDS spectra are useful for developing and optimizing analytical strategy, including estimating limits of detection for a specified electron dose and detector, lateral and depth spatial resolution as a function of beam energy, and the effects of particle geometry on the accuracy of analysis.<br/><br/>References<br/>Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E., Michael, J.R., Ritchie, N.W., Scott, J.H., and Joy, D.C., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, 4<sup>th</sup> ed., Springer, New York (2018).<br/>Ritchie, N.W., NIST DTSA-II software for quantitative electron excited X-ray microanalysis with energy dispersive spectrometry; available for free, including tutorials, at the NIST website: https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/nist-dtsa-ii (2021).<br/>Newbury, D. and Ritchie, N. “Review: Performing Elemental Microanalysis with High Accuracy and High Precision by Scanning Electron Microscopy/Silicon Drift Detector Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (SEM/SDD-EDS)”, J. Mats. Sci., 50, 493-518 (2015).<br/>Newbury, D. and Ritchie, N. “Electron-Excited X-ray Microanalysis by Energy Dispersive Spectrometry at 50: Analytical Accuracy, Precision, Trace Sensitivity, and Quantitative Compositional Mapping”, Micros. Microanal., 25, 1075-1105 (2019).

Keywords

chemical composition | electron microprobe | scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Symposium Organizers

Wenpei Gao, North Carolina State University
Arnaud Demortiere, Universite de Picardie Jules Verne
Madeline Dressel Dukes, Protochips, Inc.
Yuzi Liu, Argonne National Laboratory

Symposium Support

Silver
Protochips

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature