MRS Meetings and Events

 

SB05.04.22 2023 MRS Spring Meeting

Graphene Oxide Nanoplatforms to Enhance Cisplatin-Based Drug Delivery

When and Where

Apr 11, 2023
5:00pm - 7:00pm

Moscone West, Level 1, Exhibit Hall

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Silvia Panseri1,Arianna Rossi1,2,Ludmila Zarska3,Darren Beirne4,Giada Bassi1,5,Andrea Ruffini1,Monica Montesi1,Diego Montagner4,Vaclav Ranc3

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche1,University of Messina2,Palacký University Olomouc3,Maynooth University4,University of Chieti-Pescara5

Abstract

Silvia Panseri1,Arianna Rossi1,2,Ludmila Zarska3,Darren Beirne4,Giada Bassi1,5,Andrea Ruffini1,Monica Montesi1,Diego Montagner4,Vaclav Ranc3

Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche1,University of Messina2,Palacký University Olomouc3,Maynooth University4,University of Chieti-Pescara5
<b>INTRODUCTION</b><br/>Glioblastoma is a very aggressive type of cancer with a very poor life expectancy for patients and breast cancer often metastasizes into the liver, lungs, brain, and, in 70% of cases, to bones<sup>1,2</sup>. Chemotherapy is largely used to treat cancer and it is based on the use of molecules targeting the high cancer cell proliferation metabolism<sup>3</sup>. Platinum (Pt) and three of its isoforms (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) are some of the most successful metal-based drugs to cure breast cancer and glioblastoma<sup>4,5</sup>. Despite Pt-based chemotherapeutics being effective, their side effects (high degradation before entering the cells, the off-target organs toxicity, and cell resistance) remain great drawbacks<sup>6-9</sup>. In this work, it was developed a Graphene Oxide (GO) nanoplatform functionalized with Pt as a promising smart delivery system that could increase the Pt cellular uptake reducing the Pt amount needed for cancer treatment and consequently the side effects. <br/><b>EXPERIMENTAL METHODS</b><br/>GO nanoplatforms were treated with 8-arm polyethylene glycol-amine (PEG) that permits to load Pt on the platform (GO-PEG-Pt) and an extensive <i>in vitro</i> screening was performed on two breast cancer cell lines with aggressive nature that lead to metastatic behavior (MDA-MB 231 and MDA-MB 468) and two glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and U118). The bioactivity of GO-PEG-Pt compared to Pt-free (15 μM, 30 μM, and 60 μM) was analyzed looking at the effect on cellular uptake (ICP-OES), viability (MTT Assay), morphology (DAPI and actin staining), and migration up to 72 hours (Scratch Assay).<br/><b>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</b><br/>The cell viability was significantly lower in MDA-MB 468 and U118 cells at 30 μM for GO-PEG-Pt group compared to Pt-free (&lt;75%), and even the cell morphology seemed to be compromised. These results were highly related to the cellular uptake of GO-PEG-Pt which is significantly higher compared to Pt-free after 24 hours. This data confirmed that our nanoplatform promotes drug delivery directly inside the cells. In addition, GO-PEG-Pt mostly affected the cell migration compared to Pt-free, in particular, MDA-MB 231 showed a migration reduction of 60%, and this could be a great advantage in reducing the metastasis process. <br/><b>CONCLUSION</b><br/>This study demonstrated that the combination of Pt onto PEG-functionalized nano-sized GO provided numerous advantages for tumor therapy such as minimizing toxicity, enhancing the cellular uptake, and consequently we could reduce the side effects because a lower amount of Pt is necessary.<br/><b>REFERENCES</b><br/>1. Feng, Y. <i>et al.</i>, Genes Dis., 5(2):77-106, 2018<br/>2. Dymova, M.A. <i>et al.</i>, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22(12):6385, 2021<br/>3. Schirrmacher, V., Int. J. Oncol., 54:407–19, 2019 <br/>4. Taghavi, M.S. <i>et al.</i>, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Animal, 49:465–472, 2013 <br/>5. Martín, M., Clin. Breast Cancer, 2(3):190-208, 2001<br/>6. Bersini, S. <i>et al.</i>, J. Biomaterials, 35:2454–61, 2014 <br/>7. Lei, S. <i>et al.</i>, Cancer Commun., 12:4413, 2021 <br/>8. Rajaratnam, V. <i>et al.</i>, Cancers, 12(4):937, 2020 <br/>9. Liang, Y. <i>et al.</i>, Semin. Cancer. Biol., 60:14–27, 2020<br/><b>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</b><br/>The authors would like to thank the Nano4Tarmed project (H2020-WIDESPREAD-2020-5, grant no: 952063) for providing financial support to this project.

Symposium Organizers

Gemma-Louise Davies, University College London
Anna Salvati, University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy
Sarah Stoll, Georgetown University
Xiaodi Su, Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, A*STAR

Symposium Support

Silver
Journal of Materials Chemistry B

Bronze
Matter, Cell Press

Session Chairs

Gemma-Louise Davies
Sarah Stoll

In this Session

SB05.04.01
Anti-Bacterial Surface Based on Nanostructurs and Biocompatible Materials for Surgical Titanium Plate In Vivo

SB05.04.02
Fabrication of Antiviral/Antimicrobial Metal Nanoparticle-Embedded Polyelectrolyte Coatings for PPE Substrates

SB05.04.03
Versatile Phenol-Incorporated Nanoframes for In Situ Antibacterial Activity Based on Oxidative and Physical Damages

SB05.04.06
Development of Antimicrobial ZnO Nano-Spine Thin Film on Commercial Air Filter

SB05.04.07
Harnessing the Bio-Nano Interactions of Natural Clay for Advanced Antimicrobial Solutions

SB05.04.08
Neoteric Silver-Ceria as a Rapid, Residual Antibacterial Agent for Abiotic Surfaces

SB05.04.12
Investigating the Effect of Surface Chemistry of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles (MSNs) on MRI Performance

SB05.04.13
Application of Porous Nanomaterials in Filtration of Biological Systems

SB05.04.15
Molecular Investigation of The Interaction Between a Gold Nanoparticle and a Polymer in Aqueous Solution

SB05.04.16
Poly(acrylic acid)-Based Nanocomposite Hydrogel Prepared by Gamma-Irradiation Crosslinking for Sweat Urea Detection

View More »

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature