MRS Meetings and Events

 

EN02.09.03 2023 MRS Spring Meeting

Development of Wide-Bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells by In-Line Co-Evaporation

When and Where

Apr 13, 2023
8:45am - 9:00am

Moscone West, Level 2, Room 2002

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Wolfram Witte1,Rico Gutzler1,Wolfram Hempel1,Stefan Paetel1,Dimitrios Hariskos1

ZSW1

Abstract

Wolfram Witte1,Rico Gutzler1,Wolfram Hempel1,Stefan Paetel1,Dimitrios Hariskos1

ZSW1
Chalcopyrite-type thin-film solar cells with bandgap energy (E<sub>g</sub>) above 1.5 eV are ideal candidates for application as stable inorganic top cells in tandem devices. In recent years, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) could be increased for sulfide-based Cu(In,Ga)S<sub>2</sub> to 16.0% [1] and for pure CuGaSe<sub>2</sub> to 11.9% [2]. The implementation of a state-of-the-art post-deposition treatment (PDT) with heavy alkali elements like Rb or Cs resulted in an increased open-circuit voltage (V<sub>OC</sub>) on wide-bandgap Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> (CIGS) with Ga/(Ga+In) (GGI) ratios above 0.7 [3]. Furthermore, the addition of Ag to wide-bandgap CIGS was demonstrated as a measure to reach higher V<sub>OC</sub> values [4]. All these results were achieved with laboratory deposition coaters in a static mode. However, from an industrial point of view a fast and scalable in-line deposition process would be preferable for the growth of the wide-bandgap CIGS absorber by co-evaporation.<br/>In this study, we present our results for wide-bandgap selenide-based CIGS solar cells deposited with an industrially relevant 30 × 30 cm<sup>2</sup> multi-stage co-evaporation system. So far, best cells with E<sub>g</sub> &gt; 1.5 eV achieved efficiencies up to 6% without RbF-PDT. After implementation of an in-line RbF-PDT the typical boost in V<sub>OC</sub> and power conversion efficiency (PCE) could be obtained and best cells resulted in PCEs above 9%.<br/>The solar cell performance strongly depends on the substrate temperature during CIGS growth and the choice of subsequent buffer and high-resistive layers. By exchanging the standard CdS/i-ZnO buffer layers with CBD-Zn(O,S)/(Zn,Mg)O, which is a good option for CIGS [5] and Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)<sub>2</sub> [6] with E<sub>g</sub> in the range of 1.0 – 1.2 eV, the V<sub>OC</sub> gap between CdS- and Zn(O,S)-buffered wide-bandgap solar cells increased even further. Nevertheless, (Zn,Mg)O is a good partner for CdS and with this buffer combination we achieved a high V<sub>OC</sub> of 899 mV for a CIGS cell with E<sub>g</sub> = 1.54 eV (GGI = 0.83), resulting in an open-circuit voltage deficit (ΔV<sub>OC</sub>) of 640 mV.<br/>Moreover, we observe a gain in PCE as a result of slight Ag addition with low Ag/(Ag+Cu) ratios &lt; 0.1 for CIGS absorbers with GGI &gt; 0.6. Ag was incorporated by an additional evaporation source and these wide-bandgap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> (ACIGS) solar cells exhibit increased FF values compared to the Ag-free CIGS reference samples. This observation was also made for our ACIGS cells compared to CIGS with standard GGI = 0.3, i.e. higher FF for Ag-containing samples. For high GGI values above 0.8, the Ag incorporation shifted E<sub>g</sub> to lower values which resulted in an increased short-circuit current density and finally in an increased PCE which was accompanied by a slight increase in FF. We observe an increasing Na content in the bulk of the absorber with increasing AAC at GGI = 0.8, possibly due to altered absorber growth during deposition when more Ag is provided. Our best fully in-line prepared cell with a wide-bandgap ACIGS (E<sub>g</sub> <b>≈</b> 1.5 eV) achieved a PCE of 11.4% (without ARC). The corresponding V<sub>OC</sub> and ΔV<sub>OC</sub> values were 829 mV and 680 mV, respectively.<br/>A minor reduction of E<sub>g</sub> of about 0.2 eV to 1.34 eV (corresponding to GGI = 0.61), i.e. near the 2<sup>nd</sup> theoretical PCE maximum, resulted in a Ag-free CIGS cell with 18.2% PCE (with ARC) and a good V<sub>OC</sub> of 856 mV with ΔV<sub>OC</sub> = 480 mV.<br/><br/>[1] N. Barreau et al., EPJ Photovolt. <b>13</b> (2022) 17<br/>[2] F. Larsson et al., Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. <b>25</b> (2017) 755<br/>[3] S. Zahedi-Azad et al., Thin Solid Films <b>669</b> (2019) 629<br/>[4] J. Keller et al., Sol. RRL <b>5</b> (2021) 2100403<br/>[5] D. Hariskos et al., IEEE J. Photovolt. <b>6</b> (2016) 1321<br/>[6] M. Nakamura et al., IEEE J. Photovolt. <b>9</b> (2019) 1863

Keywords

Ag | physical vapor deposition (PVD)

Symposium Organizers

Eric Colegrove, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Jessica de Wild, imec
Byungha Shin, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Colin Wolden, Colorado School of Mines

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature