MRS Meetings and Events

 

CH04.08.02 2023 MRS Fall Meeting

STEM Developments: Atomic-Resolution SE Imaging, Fast 4D STEM, Ultrahigh Energy Resolution

When and Where

Dec 1, 2023
2:00pm - 2:30pm

Hynes, Level 3, Room 301

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Tracy Lovejoy1,Nikalas Delby1,Chris Meyer1,Michael Holtz1,Joel Martis1,Andreas Mittelberger1,Ben Plotkin-Swing1,Steven Quillin1,Ondrej Krivanek1,2

Nion R&D1,Arizona State University2

Abstract

Tracy Lovejoy1,Nikalas Delby1,Chris Meyer1,Michael Holtz1,Joel Martis1,Andreas Mittelberger1,Ben Plotkin-Swing1,Steven Quillin1,Ondrej Krivanek1,2

Nion R&D1,Arizona State University2
A modern STEM can achieve atomic-scale spatial resolution (1.1 Å) and phonon-scale energy resolution (2.6 meV) at 20 keV primary energy [1], and improved spatial but worsened energy resolutions at higher keV. These capabilities come from advanced electron-optical instrumentation, such as monochromators, correctors, and spectrometers. In parallel developments, many researchers are turning attention to combining advanced electron-optical capabilities with new developments in, detectors, software, and operating modes.<br/><br/>A new type of secondary electron (SE) detector designed by Nion for a modern STEM combines SE detection with an atom-sized probe in the operating range 20-200 kV, clean (metal-sealed and bakable) UHV vacuum conditions, and state-of-the-art electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and 4D-STEM capabilities [2,3]. Running experience reveals that common S/TEM samples (e.g. MoS2 or metal nanoparticles on a carbon film) that give atomic-resolution annual dark field (ADF) images initially show only surface contamination in the SE signal. We use multiple methods for UHV surface cleaning, including resistive heating of the whole sample in a side entry holder (e.g. Protochips) and direct laser illumination of a small spot (20 µm x 40 µm). Direct laser illumination is particularly interesting because the laser light modulates the SE signal in some samples by changing the local charge distribution on the surface [4].<br/><br/>After cleaning, atomic-resolution SE signals are readily visible. Expanding on previous work with atomic-resolution SE imaging [5], lower operation voltage in a modern STEM avoids knock-on damage and enables atomic-resolution SE studies of 2D materials. We will show an example combining atomic resolution ADF, SE, and 4D-STEM to study monolayer MoS2 with intentional Vanadium dopants at 60 keV primary energy.<br/><br/>4D-STEM and especially EELS experiments on 2D materials have traditionally been complicated by slow detectors and readout noise. The latest direct detectors avoid readout noise and achieve high DQE and dynamic range with speed approaching that of traditional single-channel detectors (&gt;10,000 frames/second). Combining these detectors with powerful open-source software for smart acquisition/compression and live processing makes multi-frame (time series) 4D-STEM or EELS imaging possible, bringing significant advantages when changing the sample environment (e.g. heating, cooling, light-, or gas-injection) causes sample drift that makes longer exposures impractical.<br/><br/>Doing these experiments in an instrument capable of &lt;5 meV energy resolution opens the door for synergistic experiments such as mapping the absolute temperature of the sample in and around the spot illuminated by a laser using electron energy gain spectroscopy [6], and measuring the presence and local bonding configuration of hydrogen in the sample by detecting the “infrared absorption” signal of the H bonds with vibrational EELS [7]. Phonon spectroscopy of surface dopants visible in the SE signal is also very promising.<br/><br/>References [1] N. Dellby et al., Microsc. Microanal. (2023) to be published [2] M.T. Hotz et al., Microsc. Microanal. (2023) to be published [3] J. Martis, B. Plotkin-Swing et al., Proceedings 20th IMC (Busan, 2023) to be published [4] J. Martis, N. Dellby et al., Proceedings 20th IMC (Busan, 2023) to be published [5] Y. Zhu et al., Nature Materials 8 (2009) 808-812. [6] J.C. Idrobo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 095901 [7] P. Rez et al., Nature Comm. 7 (2016) 10945

Keywords

chemical composition | crystallographic structure | quantum materials

Symposium Organizers

Juan Carlos Idrobo, University of Washington
Yu-Tsun Shao, University of Southern California
Sandhya Susarla, Arizona State University
Luiz Tizei, Université Paris-Saclay

Symposium Support

Bronze
Attolight AG

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature