MRS Meetings and Events

 

QT11.11.06 2022 MRS Spring Meeting

Modeling Study and Comparison of Hybrid MgB2—Ferromagnetic Shielding Designs

When and Where

May 23, 2022
9:30am - 9:45am

QT11-Virtual

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Michela Fracasso1,2,Roberto Gerbaldo1,2,Gianluca Ghigo1,2,Francesco Laviano1,2,Andrea Napolitano1,2,Simone Sparacio1,2,Daniele Torsello1,2,Mykola Solovyov3,Fedor Gomory3,Laura Gozzelino1,2

Politecnico di Torino1,INFN Sezione di Torino2,Slovak Academy of Science3

Abstract

Michela Fracasso1,2,Roberto Gerbaldo1,2,Gianluca Ghigo1,2,Francesco Laviano1,2,Andrea Napolitano1,2,Simone Sparacio1,2,Daniele Torsello1,2,Mykola Solovyov3,Fedor Gomory3,Laura Gozzelino1,2

Politecnico di Torino1,INFN Sezione di Torino2,Slovak Academy of Science3
Superconducting materials find valuable application in the fabrication of magnetic shields [1]. In this regard, MgB<sub>2</sub> has been proved to be a very promising option [2]. Moreover, it has been shown how suitable simulation tools guiding the optimization process can be a successful approach to produce devices with high shielding ability [3].<br/>This work focuses on the exploitation of a 3D modeling procedure based on a vector potential formulation [4] implemented by means of the finite-element software COMSOL Multiphysics® [5]. By this approach, we calculated the shielding properties of tube- and cup-shaped MgB<sub>2</sub> samples with a height/diameter aspect ratio close to unity.<br/>The shielding efficiency of these layouts was analysed in both the axial-field (AF) and the transverse-field (TF) orientations, studying the effect of superimposing ferromagnetic vessels of different sizes around the superconductor [3, 6]. Then, focusing on the most efficient hybrid arrangements, we investigated their shielding performances for different angles of the applied magnetic field and compared the results obtained on the hybrid layouts with the corresponding superconducting configuration.<br/>Finally, a multiphysics analysis is presented as a preliminary modelling approach to predict the flux jumps phenomena that were observed during the experimental measurements [7].<br/><b>References</b><br/>[1] K.Hogan et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol., 31, 015001 (2018).<br/>[2] D.Barna et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 29, 4101310 (2019).<br/>[3] COMSOL Multiphysics®5.4 software (http://www.comsol.com).<br/>[4] L. Gozzelino, M. Fracasso et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. Accepted (2021).<br/>[5] L. Gozzelino et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol., 33, 044018 (2020).<br/>[6] L. Gozzelino, M. Fracasso et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. Accepted (2021).<br/>[7] L. Gozzelino et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol., 33, 044018 (2020).

Symposium Organizers

Paolo Mele, Shibaura Institute of Technology
Valeria Braccini, CNR - SPIN
Kazumasa Iida, Nagoya Univ
Qiang Li, Stony Brook University/Brookhaven National Laboratory

Symposium Support

Silver
SuperOx Japan

Bronze
SuNAM Co., Ltd.

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature