MRS Meetings and Events

 

SF07.09.02 2022 MRS Fall Meeting

Phase Stability of A2B-Type GCP Compound in Ni-Cr-Mo System Alloys at Elevated Temperatures

When and Where

Dec 1, 2022
2:00pm - 2:15pm

Sheraton, 5th Floor, Riverway

Presenter

Co-Author(s)

Ryota Nagashima1,Hirotoyo Nakashima1,Masao Takeyama1

Tokyo Institute of Technology1

Abstract

Ryota Nagashima1,Hirotoyo Nakashima1,Masao Takeyama1

Tokyo Institute of Technology1
Most of the geometrically close-packed (GCP) compounds are A<sub>3</sub>B type, whereas a very few A<sub>2</sub>B type GCP compound exists. The Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr (<i>oP</i>6) is one of them. According to the Ni-Cr phase diagram, this phase is a Kurnakov-type compound and is stable up to 867 K. Recently, our systematic phase diagram study on Ni-Cr-Mo ternary system experimentally reveals that a single-phase region of Ni<sub>2</sub>(Cr, Mo) with <i>oP</i>6 crystal structure exists as an island with compositions around Ni-15Cr-15Mo (at.%), up to about 1073 K, approximately 200 K higher than the binary Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr compound. The reason why Mo in solution in Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr phase stabilizes the phase is bonding energy between Cr and Mo in Cr site should be negative, because thermodynamical calculation shows that modifying ternary-interaction parameter <i>L</i><sub>Cr,Mo:Ni</sub> to negative is the most strongly contributes to reproduce the experimental phase diagram in other thermodynamical parameters, <i>e.g.</i> end-members and interaction parameters among binary and ternary elements. This result is very attractive from both fundamental and engineering viewpoints. The Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr phase could be an alternative strengthener to Ni<sub>3</sub>Al-γ' phase in Ni-based alloys, if we can further increase the phase stability. In this study, then, in order to verify the mechanism of the increase in phase stability of Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr compound by Mo addition, effect of 5<sup>th</sup> and 6<sup>th</sup> group elements on the phase equilibria at elevated temperatures were systematically examined. Thermodynamic calculations to evaluate the phase stability of this phase is also conducted, by taking the interaction parameters among the three elements into account. Two series of alloys were prepared: series I with nominal compositions of Ni-15Cr-15(Mo, M) (at.%) by replacing Mo with M by every 5 at.% and series II with those of Ni-15Cr-15Mo-5M by addition of 5at.%M to Ni-15Cr-15Mo. These alloys were prepared by arc melting in argon atmosphere with non-consumable tungsten electrode as 35 g button ingots. These ingots were firstly cold rolled by 40% in height, and solution treated at 1473 K for 24 h, followed by a water quench, in order to eliminate the micro segregation. Then, they were equilibrated at 1173-973 K for up to 1000 h. It was found that, in any alloys containing M, the observed Ni<sub>2</sub>(Cr, Mo) single phase region in the ternary system was reduced, even in the case of V where Ni<sub>2</sub>V is also the A<sub>2</sub>B type GCP compound with the <i>oP</i>6 structures. Instead, the stable A<sub>3</sub>B-type GCP phases of Ni<sub>3</sub>V-γ" (D0<sub>22</sub>), Ni<sub>3</sub>Nb-δ (D0<sub>a</sub>) and Ni<sub>3</sub>Ta-δ (D0<sub>a</sub>) appears in the quaternary systems, indicating that the M elements apparently destabilize the <i>oP</i>6 phase with respect to the A<sub>3</sub>B-type GCP phases. The A<sub>2</sub>B type GCP phase has B-B bonding unlike A<sub>3</sub>B type, so the total bonding energy should always be smaller for A<sub>2</sub>B than A<sub>3</sub>B (Ω<sub>A-B</sub> &lt; 0). The thermodynamically stable existence of the Ni<sub>2</sub>(Cr, Mo) phase, despite the thermodynamic existence of the Ni<sub>3</sub>Mo-δ phase in the binary system, must be caused by not only the interaction among ternary elements but also size effects. Based on these results, together with the thermodynamic calculations on the observed A<sub>2</sub>B and A<sub>3</sub>B type GCP phases, elements which do not form A<sub>3</sub>B type GCP phase would possibly be effective in increasing the stability of Ni<sub>2</sub>Cr. The size effect as well as atomic scale considerations on the difference in phase stability between A<sub>3</sub>B and A<sub>2</sub>B type GCP phases will also be touched in detail. A part of this research was supported by JST-Mirai Program Grant Number JPMJMI21E7, Japan.

Keywords

alloy | crystallographic structure | microstructure

Symposium Organizers

Matthew Willard, Case Western Reserve University
Yoshisato Kimura, Tokyo Institute of Technology
Manja Krueger, Otto-von-Guericke University
Akane Suzuki, GE Research

Symposium Support

Silver
GE Research

Publishing Alliance

MRS publishes with Springer Nature