April 7 - 11, 2025
Seattle, Washington
Symposium Supporters
2025 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL11.09.03

Activation of Ge in Ga2O3—Role of Capping Layer, Ambient and Defect Formation

When and Where

Apr 10, 2025
2:30pm - 2:45pm
Summit, Level 4, Room 435

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Tianhai Luo1,Katie Gann1,Cameron Gorsak1,Prescott Evans2,Thaddeus Asel2,Hari Nair1,Michael Thompson1

Cornell University1,Air Force Research Laboratory2

Abstract

Tianhai Luo1,Katie Gann1,Cameron Gorsak1,Prescott Evans2,Thaddeus Asel2,Hari Nair1,Michael Thompson1

Cornell University1,Air Force Research Laboratory2
β-Ga2O3 has extensive potential as a UWBG semiconductor for power electronics. A key advantage of β-Ga2O3 is the availability of several shallow n-type dopants that can be ion implanted to achieve low resistance ohmic contacts. While Si implants have been extensively studied, there has been far less exploration of Ge and Sn as alternatives. In this work, we report on thermal annealing of ion-implanted Ge in β-Ga2O3 as a function of the annealing ambient, temperature, time, and capping layers. Under optimized conditions, we demonstrate over 40% activation of 50 nm box implants to 5x1019 cm-3 (sheet carrier 1.6x1014 cm-2) with a mobility of 64 cm2/V-s. This is the highest reported activation for Ge-doped β-Ga2O3.
Homoepitaxial UID films of β-Ga2O3 (~500 nm) were grown by MOCVD on Fe-doped (010) native substrates. Prior to ion implantation, samples were capped with a 20 nm SiO2 by ALD to ensure uniform doping to the surface. Four implant energies were used to yield 100 nm box profile concentrations of 5x1019 and 3x1019 cm-3, and a 50 nm box profile of 5x1019 cm-3. Samples were annealed under high purity nitrogen at temperatures from 100 to 1050 oC, times from 5 to 20 min, and with and without the SiO2 capping layer. Carrier concentrations and mobility were determined by van der Pauw Hall measurements, diffusion profiles were determined by SIMS, and lattice damage was characterized by XRD.
As-implanted samples showed clear evidence of γ-phase formation by XRD. Implant damage recovery was observed to begin at temperatures of 100 oC with loss of the γ-phase beginning at 600 oC. Complete lattice recovery was observed after 950 oC for 10 minutes for all but the 5x1019/100 nm. Annealing in the absence of the SiO2 cap resulted in reduced carrier activation of 15% with mobilities of 74 cm2/V-s. However, when annealed under identical conditions with the cap in place, activation increased to 40% with mobilities above 60 cm2/V-s, which is consistent with the significantly enhanced ionized donors. A subsequent 20 min anneal at 950 oC, after the removal of the cap, showed carrier activation loss to 20% with an increase in mobility. Based on the behavior of Si implant annealing, we believe the presence of the cap reduces the formation of compensating Ga vacancies, resulting in the enhanced activation.
SIMS diffusion measurements show substantial redistribution of Ge at these concentrations to depths >220 nm. The diffusion profiles indicate that Ge diffusivity is dramatically enhanced at concentrations above 1x1019 cm-3 resulting in nearly constant concentration profiles. In addition, near the implant and damage peak, approximately 30% of the Ge is immobile and likely trapped in defect complexes. These data provide a framework for understanding the dopant diffusion and activation of Ge in β-Ga2O3.

Keywords

Ga | Ge | oxide

Symposium Organizers

Robert Kaplar, Sandia National Laboratories
Filip Tuomisto, University of Helsinki
Motoaki Iwaya, Meijo University
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Santa Barbara

Symposium Support

Silver
Taiyo Nippon Sanso

Session Chairs

Sriram Krishnamoorthy
Jacob H Leach

In this Session