April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting
SB02.08.04

Doping Effectiveness and Stability in Semiconducting Polymers

When and Where

Apr 25, 2024
9:15am - 9:30am
Room 437, Level 4, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Meghna Jha1,Joaquin Mogollon Santiana1,Aliyah Jacob1,Kathleen Light1,Megan Hong1,Michael Lau1,Leah Filardi1,Sadi Gurses1,Coleman Kronawitter1,Adam Moule1

University of California, Davis1

Abstract

Meghna Jha1,Joaquin Mogollon Santiana1,Aliyah Jacob1,Kathleen Light1,Megan Hong1,Michael Lau1,Leah Filardi1,Sadi Gurses1,Coleman Kronawitter1,Adam Moule1

University of California, Davis1
Molecular doping of semiconducting polymers has emerged as a prominent research topic in the field of organic electronics with new dopant molecules introduced regularly. FeCl<sub>3</sub> has gained attention as a p-type dopant due to its low-cost, availability, ability to dope high ionization energy co-polymers, and its use as a dopant that can be used with anion exchange. Here, we use a combination of UV-Vis-NIR<br/>spectroscopy, four-probe sheet resistance measurements, and X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy to perform lifetime measurements to assess the stability of the doped polymers over time, which is crucial for evaluating the long-term performance and reliability of the doped films. FeCl<sub>3</sub> can cause radical side reactions that damage the conjugated polymer backbone, leading to degradation of the electronic properties. The rate of this degradation is orders of magnitude higher when the film is exposed to air. Anion exchange doping can reduce the [FeCl<sub>4</sub>]<sup>−</sup> concentration, but does not necessarily improve the doping lifetime because anion exchange electrolytes can serve<br/>as co-reactants for the degradation reaction. By comparison, doping with (2,3,5,6-Tetrafluoro-2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-diylidene)dimalononitrile (F4TCNQ) as the reactive dopant results in lower initial conductivity, but the lifetime of the doped polymer is almost tripled as compared to FeCl<sub>3</sub> doped polymer films. These findings highlight that the use of FeCl<sub>3</sub> as a molecular dopant requires a cost/benefit analysis between higher initial doping levels and lower film stability.

Keywords

reactivity

Symposium Organizers

Xiaodan Gu, University of Southern Mississippi
Chad Risko, University of Kentucky
Bob Schroeder, University College London
Natalie Stingelin, Georgia Institute of Technology

Symposium Support

Bronze
MDPI AG

Session Chairs

Mariano Campoy-Quiles
Xiaodan Gu

In this Session