April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EN09.05.05

Cation Exchange Ionomer-Based Microenvironment Control of Gas Diffusion Electrode for Efficient CO2 Electroreduction

When and Where

Apr 24, 2024
9:30am - 9:45am
Room 337, Level 3, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Yujin Lee1,Daewon Bae1,Woosuck Kwon1,Hansol Choi2,Hyungju Ahn3,Chang Hyuck Choi2,Chanyeon Kim1,Dae-Hyun Nam1

Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology (DGIST)1,Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)2,Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL)3

Abstract

Yujin Lee1,Daewon Bae1,Woosuck Kwon1,Hansol Choi2,Hyungju Ahn3,Chang Hyuck Choi2,Chanyeon Kim1,Dae-Hyun Nam1

Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology (DGIST)1,Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)2,Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL)3
Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) where CO2 is converted into a high-value-added compound can be a great strategy for carbon neutrality. Gas diffusion electrode (GDE) which allows the formation of triple phase boundary (TPB) of catalyst, electrolyte, and CO2 gas has been widely applied for CO2RR. It results in overcoming the CO2 solubility limitation in double phase boundary (DPB) of electrolyte and catalyst, and thus increases the CO2 availability. However, the volume of TPB where the reaction occurs is much smaller than the volume of DPB. Therefore, it is important to increase the volume of TPB for CO2RR activity. Cation exchange ionomer enables us to control the volume of TPB. The hydrophobic chains of ionomer that play a role as gas channel and hydrophilic ionic groups that form a water matrix increase the volume of TPB in GDE-based systems.
Here, we verify the effect of ionomer on CO2RR performance in 1 M KOH electrolyte by controlling CO2/H2O ratio and CO2 availability near GDE-based Cu catalyst surface. To distinguish the effect of each part of ionomer, we control the variables of ionomer; (1) Controlling the length of side chain with the application of Nafion as long side chain (LSC) ionomer and Aquivion as short side chain (SSC) ionomer, (2) Fixation of equivalent weight (EW). Compared to the maximum H2 partial current density (JH2) of 71.3 mA/cm2 at bare Cu, Nafion decreases the maximum JH2 to 11.5 mA/cm2 while Aquivion decreases it to 26.4 mA/cm2. On the other hand, the maximum CO partial current density (JCO) is 75.1 mA/cm2 at Nafion whereas it is 24.1 mA/cm2 at Aquivion. Nafion and Aquivion also improve the maximum C2H4 partial current density (JC2H4) to 169.5 and 173.3 mA/cm2, respectively. Based on the characterization of ionomers in GDE, we found that LSC ionomer can induce a higher CO2/H2O ratio than SSC ionomer and increase CO2 availability near the active site. Also, we assume that it affects the CO2RR selectivity by tuning the local OH- concentration. Improved OH- formation by high current density CO2RR at ionomer-augmented catalysts affects the surface charge density that can enhance CO2RR selectivity. Therefore, the key factor of ionomer effect on CO2RR performance enhancement is regulation of the water concentration near the catalyst surface which impacts the CO2 availability and ion conductivity through this water matrix. We expect that this work will suggest a more accurate understanding of the mechanism of ionomer effect on CO2RR and strategy for optimizing the microenvironment of catalyst for efficient CO2RR.

Keywords

Cu

Symposium Organizers

Christopher Barile, University of Nevada, Reno
Nathalie Herlin-Boime, CEA Saclay
Michel Trudeau, Concordia University
Edmund Chun Ming Tse, University Hong Kong

Session Chairs

Michel Trudeau
Edmund Chun Ming Tse

In this Session