April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting
EL04.13.05

Control of ZnO defects for quantum information applications

When and Where

Apr 26, 2024
11:30am - 11:45am
Room 345, Level 3, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

David Lister1,Shirin Riahi1,Abbas Nakhlband1,Manu Hegde1,Xingyi Wang2,Kai-Mei Fu2,Simon Watkins1

Simon Fraser University1,University of Washington2

Abstract

David Lister1,Shirin Riahi1,Abbas Nakhlband1,Manu Hegde1,Xingyi Wang2,Kai-Mei Fu2,Simon Watkins1

Simon Fraser University1,University of Washington2
ZnO is a promising candidate for the manipulation of quantum information (QI) in a direct bandgap semiconductor. Among compound semiconductors, ZnO has very low spin orbit coupling which results in much longer spin-lattice relaxation times than GaAs, InP etc.[1] In nanostructured form, ZnO has low surface recombination rates compared with GaAs and other compound semiconductors, meaning that it is a very strong emitter of light even for sub-optical nanowire dimensions. Donor bound exciton (D<sup>0</sup>X) defects such as simple substitutional group III elements are promising candidates for QI applications and can be coupled to their donor final state spins by very sharp line excitonic transitions. In addition, the exciton Bohr radius of ZnO is considerably smaller than GaAs, and InP making it less likely for donors within a NW to experience quantum confinement effects or surface fields. D<sup>0</sup>X centers in nanowires grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) achieve optical linewidths comparable to the best quality bulk material. Recently coherent optical trapping of excitons was observed in In-donors in Zn) NWs grown by MOVPE. [2]<br/>In this work, we discuss methods of achieving very low densities of such defects in ZnO in bulk and NW form. First, we show how the concentration of Ga donors can be controlled down to the 10<sup>15</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup> range by MOVPE using triethylgallium as a dopant. We use a simple model of exciton pair interactions to estimate these numbers. A second example is the so-called I<sub>10</sub> defect which is known from radioisotope studies to contain Sn on Zn site.[3] We consider 2 types of samples: (1) bulk Sn-doped ZnO grown by CVD and (2) ZnO bulk substrates implanted with Sn ions. From an application point of view, Sn implantation is a preferred method for generating these defects. We show that I<sub>10</sub> emission can be reversibly generated and destroyed by heat treatments. After annealing in a nitrogen environment at 900<sup>o</sup>C, the intensity of I<sub>10</sub> in the CVD samples can be reduced by several orders of magnitude. After such a heat treatment, by annealing under Li, the I<sub>10</sub>emission can be completely restored. This strongly suggests that I<sub>10</sub> is a complex consisting of a Sn double donor complexed with a Li acceptor. Density functional calculations are consistent with this model. This defect provides a promising avenue of study for addressing single donor spins for QI since the concentration can be carefully controlled by means of low temperature diffusion or annealing under inert gas. A set of Li-related lines D<sup>0</sup>X lines is also observed in addition to I<sub>10</sub>.<br/>A final issue related to the use of NWs for QI involves a broad emission band, SX, commonly seen in high purity samples in the 3.364 eV energy range. This band is attributed to excitons bound to surface states, and results in a strong background as sample purity increases and NW radius decreases. This may impact the ability to detect and control small numbers of donor spins for QI applications. We present the results of photoluminescence excitation (PLE) measurements indicating that the SX band is associated with localized surface states, with varying binding energies, rather some kind of band bending mechanism as previously proposed. The effect of surface treatments on this emission band are also discussed in this paper.<br/><br/>[1] Xiayu Linpeng, Maria L.K. Viitaniemi, Aswin Vishnuradhan, Y. Kozuka, Cameron Johnson, M. Kawasaki, and Kai-Mei C. Fu, Phys. Rev. Applied, 10, 064061 (2018).<br/>[2] M. L. K. Viitaniemi, C. Zimmermann, V. Niaouris, S. H. D’Ambrosia, X. Wang, E. Senthil Kumar, F. Mohammadbeigi, S. P. Watkins, and Kai-Mei C. Fu, Nano Lett. 22, 2134 (2022).<br/>[3] J. Cullen, D. Byrne, K. Johnston, E. McGlynn, and M. O. Henry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 192110 (2013)

Keywords

epitaxy | qubit

Symposium Organizers

Hideki Hirayama, RIKEN
Robert Kaplar, Sandia National Laboratories
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Santa Barbara
Matteo Meneghini, University of Padova

Symposium Support

Silver
Taiyo Nippon Sanso

Session Chairs

Robert Kaplar
Sriram Krishnamoorthy

In this Session