April 7 - 11, 2025
Seattle, Washington
Symposium Supporters
2025 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL10.05.03

Correlation of Mobile Ion Concentration to the Stability and Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells

When and Where

Apr 9, 2025
2:15pm - 2:30pm
Summit, Level 4, Room 434

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Saivineeth Penukula1,Shrinivas Balwadkar1,Urs Aeberhard2,Mohin Sharma3,Mritunjaya Parashar3,Ross Kerner4,Min Chen4,Rafikul Ali Saha5,Eduardo Solano6,Maarten Roeffaers5,Ian Sellers7,Joseph Berry4,Joseph Luther4,Julian Steele8,Axel Palmstrom4,Bibhudutta Rout3,Nicholas Rolston1

Arizona State University1,Fluxim AG2,University of North Texas3,National Renewable Energy Laboratory4,KU Leuven5,ALBA Synchrotron6,University at Buffalo, The State University of New York7,The University of Queensland8

Abstract

Saivineeth Penukula1,Shrinivas Balwadkar1,Urs Aeberhard2,Mohin Sharma3,Mritunjaya Parashar3,Ross Kerner4,Min Chen4,Rafikul Ali Saha5,Eduardo Solano6,Maarten Roeffaers5,Ian Sellers7,Joseph Berry4,Joseph Luther4,Julian Steele8,Axel Palmstrom4,Bibhudutta Rout3,Nicholas Rolston1

Arizona State University1,Fluxim AG2,University of North Texas3,National Renewable Energy Laboratory4,KU Leuven5,ALBA Synchrotron6,University at Buffalo, The State University of New York7,The University of Queensland8
Ion migration is one of the important factors affecting the stability and operational lifetimes of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Hence, it is very important to understand the correlation of ion migration to stability and its impact on PSC power conversion efficiencies (PCE). But ion migration analysis is typically qualitative by either showing the presence of migrating ions in PSC or identifying the migrating species without any knowledge of the densities or mobilities of the ions. Our previous work has shown that ion migration in PSCs can be quantified in terms of mobile ion concentration (No) and ion mobility. No of PSC is obtained by determining the ionic charge by integrating the drift current (from the transient dark current response of PSC after the applied voltage of 0.8V for 10ms in forward bias) with time and using the empirical relation between No and ionic charge. No exhibits a wider range of magnitude over a range of 7 orders from 1011 – 1018 cm-3 based on the type of top electrode used for PSC.
In this work, we expand and deepen our understanding of No by correlating it with chemical species in a PSC and as a quantitative stability metric for devices. Our hypothesis was that mobile metal ions that diffuse from the top electrode through the fullerene-based ETL with low barrier properties can influence No and result in degradation through metal-halide reactions. In this study, we selected p-i-n devices that incorporated dense barrier layers of tin oxide (SnO2) or ozone-nucleated SnO2 (O3-SnO2) to stop the diffusion of metal ions along with different top-electrode chemistries compared with fullerene-only ETLs. We show the impact of top-electrode chemistry on No where the use of silver (Ag) electrodes results in significantly higher No values > 1014 cm-3 when compared to a gold (Au) with No values of ~ 1013 cm-3 or carbon top electrode with No values < 1013 cm-3. PSCs that contain a SnO2 barrier with an Ag electrode also have significantly lower No values < 1013 cm-3. We confirm the involvement of Ag ion diffusion through the ETL and into the active layer while quantifying the increase of the Ag ions into the underlying device layers with No and Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), except in the case of PSCs with O3-SnO2 barrier layer. In situ measurements of No in PSCs with increasing temperatures showed a threshold No value (~2.8 * 1016 ± 8.5 * 1015 cm-3) that correlates with device failure, which occurs at lower temperatures for non-barrier devices (~370 K) and higher temperatures for barrier devices (~450 K) and that O3-SnO2 stops Ag diffusion and improves thermal stability.
We also report on the correlation of No and performance of PSCs demonstrated by drift-diffusion simulations using a realistic inverted p-i-n device configuration with nickel oxide (NiOx) as HTL and C60 as ETL. In the model, we varied the No from 1011 cm-3 (extremely low) to 1018 cm-3 (extremely high), keeping either the cations mobile, anions mobile, or both mobile. We found that there was essentially no change in PCE with a higher No which was unexpected. However, it is overly simplified because the simulations did not include any non-radiative recombination parameters. We also decided to use mobile cations with fixed anions to correspond to the positively charged halide vacancies that cause ion migration. While operating the PSC at a realistic surface recombination velocity (~103 cm/s) simulations show a negligible impact on PCE with a No < 1015 cm-3 but show a drastic impact on PCE with a No > 1015 cm-3. Simulations also showed the need to reduce the recombination at the HTL as higher recombination velocities at HTL had a greater impact on the PCE of PSCs when compared to higher recombination at ETL. Further ongoing efforts involve modeling the transient dark current response of a PSC and extracting No using SETFOS to compare the ion dynamics with experimental measurements to develop a realistic parameter set for simulation.

Symposium Organizers

Peijun Guo, Yale University
Lina Quan, Virginia Institute of Technology
Sascha Feldmann, Harvard University
Xiwen Gong, University of Michigan

Session Chairs

Suchismita Guha
Peijun Guo

In this Session