April 7 - 11, 2025
Seattle, Washington
Symposium Supporters
2025 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL11.07.17

Computational Prediction of the Intrinsic Point Defects of α-GaO: Cation Split-Vacancy Configuration

When and Where

Apr 9, 2025
5:00pm - 7:00pm
Summit, Level 2, Flex Hall C

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Ke Li1,David Scanlon2

University College London1,University of Birmingham2

Abstract

Ke Li1,David Scanlon2

University College London1,University of Birmingham2
Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) is an emerging wide-bandgap semiconductor with significant potential in power electronics and optoelectronics. Among the polymorphs, α-Ga2O3 which is isostructural to sapphire exhibits the largest bandgap of around 5.1 to 5.3 eV and a breakdown electric field of 9.5 MV/cm.1 Research on α-Ga2O3 was mainly focused on materials properties and growth, while its point defect chemistry and the influence of defects on its optical properties remain overlooked. With the benefit of having a wide bandgap, extrinsic doping can introduce new energy levels within the bandgap, enhancing the radiative recombination process, and thus improving photoluminescence efficiency.

In this work, we employ PBE0 hybrid Density Functional Theory (DFT) to investigate both the intrinsic defect chemistry, extrinsic defects with Silicon (Si), Tin (Sn) and Germanium (Ge) doping of α-Ga2O3 and their corresponding optical transition levels after extrinsic doping. 2 We observe a large optical band gap of around 5.60 eV, matching well with the experimental data of 5.61 eV.3 Understanding defects is crucial for determining the optical transition levels as they can introduce new recombination pathways that shift the wavelength of emitted light, which is useful for tuning the photoluminescence properties of a material. Therefore, comprehensive intrinsic and extrinsic defect studies were performed using ShakeNBreak and DOPED,4–6 and the optical transition levels were also studied, providing valuable insight towards the photoluminescence properties of Si, Sn and Ge-doped α-Ga2O3.

1. Nicol, D. et al. Hydrogen-related 3.8 eV UV luminescence in α-Ga2O3. Applied Physics Letters 122, 062102 (2023).
2. Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. The Journal of Chemical Physics 110, 6158–6170 (1999).
3. Segura, A., Artús, L., Cuscó, R., Goldhahn, R. & Feneberg, M. Band gap of corundumlike α-Ga2O3 determined by absorption and ellipsometry. Phys. Rev. Materials 1, 024604 (2017).
4. Mosquera-Lois, I., Kavanagh, S. R., Walsh, A. & Scanlon, D. O. ShakeNBreak: Navigating the defect configurationallandscape. JOSS 7, 4817 (2022).
5. Mosquera-Lois, I., Kavanagh, S. R., Walsh, A. & Scanlon, D. O. Identifying the ground state structures of point defects in solids. npj Comput Mater 9, 25 (2023).
6. Kavanagh, S. R. Defect Oriented Python Environment Distrubution.

Symposium Organizers

Robert Kaplar, Sandia National Laboratories
Filip Tuomisto, University of Helsinki
Motoaki Iwaya, Meijo University
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Santa Barbara

Symposium Support

Silver
Taiyo Nippon Sanso

Session Chairs

Robert Kaplar
Sriram Krishnamoorthy

In this Session