April 7 - 11, 2025
Seattle, Washington
Symposium Supporters
2025 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL11.10.07

Electrochemical Enhancement of Interstitial-Based 18O Isotopic Fractionation in TiO2

When and Where

Apr 11, 2025
9:45am - 10:00am
Summit, Level 4, Room 435

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Ian Suni1,Heonjae Jeong2,Raylin Chen1,Joseph Hladik1,Marina Miletic3,Xiao Su1,Edmund Seebauer1

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1,Gachon University2,The University of New Mexico3

Abstract

Ian Suni1,Heonjae Jeong2,Raylin Chen1,Joseph Hladik1,Marina Miletic3,Xiao Su1,Edmund Seebauer1

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign1,Gachon University2,The University of New Mexico3
Isotopically pure materials are critical for quantum computing and cooling of electronic devices, but obtaining the requisite purities is technologically challenging. Submersion of specially prepared wide-bandgap oxide surfaces into aqueous solutions near room temperature injects oxygen interstitial atoms (Oi) into the solid.1 The highly mobile Oi facilitates post-synthesis processing in a regime wherein kinetic rather than thermodynamic effects dominate defect behavior. In particular, a counterintuitive “uphill diffusion” phenomenon becomes possible that offers a solid-state mechanism for reducing the concentration of isotopic impurities through the statistics of interstitialcy-mediated diffusion combined with steep interstitial gradients.2 Isotopic fractionation emerges as a near-surface minimum in the 18O concentration that is below the natural abundance of 18O. Here, isotopic self-diffusion measurements of 18O in single-crystal rutile TiO2 show that an applied potential bias increases the width of the 18O-depleted region from approximately 2.8 nm to as high as 90 nm. Isotopic depletion increases from approximately 1.4x below natural abundance to as much as 3x. In addition, injection fluxes under potential bias increase by up to 25x, resulting in penetration of O-interstitials up to 10 mm below the surface. Important side benefits thereby arise for defect engineering.1 Surprisingly, the augmentations appear independent of applied potential. Possible mechanisms for these electrochemical effects include removal of surface contamination that otherwise inhibits surface injection of Oi, electrostatic effects from TiO2 surface charging, and the application of an electric field. Microkinetic modeling simulations of 18O injection and diffusion demonstrate how the uphill diffusion mechanism induces fractionation to evolve over time. This physical picture applies not only to oxygen and TiO2, but also to metal cations and other wide-bandgap semiconductors.
References

1. Heonjae Jeong, Elif Ertekin and Edmund G. Seebauer, “Surface-Based Post-synthesis Manipulation of Point Defects in Metal Oxides Using Liquid Water,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 14 (2022) 34059-34068.
2. Heonjae Jeong and Edmund G. Seebauer, “Strong Isotopic Fractionation of Oxygen in TiO2 Obtained by Surface-Enhanced Solid-State Diffusion,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 13 (2022) 9841-9847.

Keywords

defects | secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) | surface reaction

Symposium Organizers

Robert Kaplar, Sandia National Laboratories
Filip Tuomisto, University of Helsinki
Motoaki Iwaya, Meijo University
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Santa Barbara

Symposium Support

Silver
Taiyo Nippon Sanso

Session Chairs

Julita Smalc-Koziorowska
Filip Tuomisto

In this Session