Apr 10, 2025
4:00pm - 4:15pm
Summit, Level 4, Room 435
Matthew McCluskey1,Jesse Huso2,Benjamin Dutton1,Cassandra Remple1,John McCloy1,Arkka Bhattacharyya3,Sriram Krishnamoorthy3,Steve Rebollo3,James Speck3,Joel Varley4,Lars Voss4
Washington State University1,Klar Scientific2,University of California, Santa Barbara3,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory4
Matthew McCluskey1,Jesse Huso2,Benjamin Dutton1,Cassandra Remple1,John McCloy1,Arkka Bhattacharyya3,Sriram Krishnamoorthy3,Steve Rebollo3,James Speck3,Joel Varley4,Lars Voss4
Washington State University1,Klar Scientific2,University of California, Santa Barbara3,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory4
Monoclinic gallium oxide (β-Ga
2O
3) single crystals have a Raman mode at ~250 cm
-1 (~31 meV) that is strongly correlated with free-electron density and therefore assigned to an electronic excitation of a shallow donor impurity band. The present work, however, demonstrates that heavily
n-type epilayers grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) or molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) do not contain this peak, contradicting the shallow-donor assignment. An alternate model is proposed: the 250 cm
-1 Raman peak arises from gallium clusters, defined as two or more Ga atoms that form Ga–Ga bonds. Raman mapping reveals variations in the frequency that are consistent with a distribution of cluster sizes. The intensity of the peak decreases as temperature is raised, attributed to melting or dissociation of the Ga clusters. First-principles calculations on clusters at the two extremes, Ga metal and an isolated point defect, indicate that the 250 cm
-1 mode is due to a Ga–Ga bond-stretching vibration. As the Fermi energy is raised, the formation of Ga–Ga dimers becomes energetically favorable, explaining the correlation between
n-type conductivity and the Raman peak.