Apr 9, 2025
8:45am - 9:15am
Summit, Level 3, Room 330
Stela Canulescu1,Evgeniia Gilshtein1,Alexandra Tsekou1,Danylo Komisar2,Harshvardhan Maheshkant Gupta1,Outman El Khouja3,Cristina Besleaga3,Aurelian Galca3,Maarja Grossberg-Kuusk4,Dae-Hwan Kim5,Shi-Joon Sung Sung5,Oleksii Ilchenko2
Technical University of Denmark1,LightNovo2,National Institute of Materials Physics3,Tallinn University of Technology4,DGIST5
Stela Canulescu1,Evgeniia Gilshtein1,Alexandra Tsekou1,Danylo Komisar2,Harshvardhan Maheshkant Gupta1,Outman El Khouja3,Cristina Besleaga3,Aurelian Galca3,Maarja Grossberg-Kuusk4,Dae-Hwan Kim5,Shi-Joon Sung Sung5,Oleksii Ilchenko2
Technical University of Denmark1,LightNovo2,National Institute of Materials Physics3,Tallinn University of Technology4,DGIST5
Antimony sulfide (Sb
2S
3) has emerged as a promising absorber material for next-generation thin-film photovoltaics (PV) due to its attractive and robust properties. These include an absorption coefficient exceeding 10
5 cm
-1, a bandgap ranging from 1.60 to 1.70 eV, good environmental stability, and a simple binary composition. Interestingly, Sb
2S
3 distinguishes itself from conventional solar absorbers like CdTe, Cu(In,Ga)Se
2 (CIGS), or Cu
2ZnSn(S,Se)
4 (CZTSSe) through its unique quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) crystal structure. This structure, comprising [ Sb
4S
6]
n ribbons covalently bonded along the c-axis, leads to anisotropic carrier transport. While efficient along the [hk1] direction, transport in the [hk0] direction is limited due to interlayer hopping mechanisms. This inherent anisotropy offers unique advantages but also challenges optimizing Sb
2S
3 PV device performance, particularly in optimizing grain orientation. Moreover, inevitable grain boundaries (GBs) in polycrystalline materials and trap states in bulk and at interfaces can significantly impact overall efficiency.
1In this work, we will present several strategies for engineering the preferred [hk1] orientation of Sb
2S
3 solar absorbers via bulk engineering by controlling the grain orientation during film growth and substrate/back-contact engineering in substrate and superstrate device configurations. Furthermore, we will show that Polarized Raman Microscopy (PRM) can be utilized to map the local crystallographic orientation of Sb
2S
3 polycrystalline films at a spatial resolution of approximately 200 nm. PRM provides detailed insights into the structural quality and phase purity, with 3D orientation maps revealing differences between films with engineered [hk1] orientation and those with random grain orientations.
In the second part of the talk, we focus on the electronic structure and surface characteristics of Sb
2S
3 films and their interfaces using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS), and Reflection Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (REELS). Combined XPS/UPS can provide valuable information on the chemical states of Sb in Sb
2S
3 , along with the valence band maximum (VBM), work function (WF), and Fermi level position, all of which are essential for understanding the band alignment between Sb
2S
3 and adjacent layers in the photovoltaic device
2. One of the main challenges in Sb
2S
3 devices is the unfavorable band alignment when using the CdS buffer layer, which forms a "cliff-like" interface.
3 Instead of the traditional CdS buffer layer, Mg
xZn
1-xO (MZO) thin oxide films were chosen in this study as alternative n-type layers. REELS is integrated into this study to examine further the surface properties of the wide band gap MZO films, namely the surface band gap. Our data reveal that the band gap and the conduction band minimum (CBM) of MZO can be tuned as a function of Mg content. Consequently, the conduction band offset (CBO) can be adequately tailored by tuning the Mg content, ensuring more efficient charge transfer at the Sb
2S
3/MZO interface.
Overall, with this combination of techniques, a detailed electronic and chemical picture of the bulk and interface is painted, which will be discussed in view of its impact on the performance of Sb
2S
3 PV devices.
References 1. Liu, X.
et al. Grain Engineering of Sb
2S
3 Thin Films to Enable Efficient Planar Solar Cells with High Open-Circuit Voltage.
Advanced Materials 36, 2305841 (2024).
2. Gansukh, M.
et al. Energy band alignment at the heterointerface between CdS and Ag-alloyed CZTS.
Sci Rep 10, (2020).
3. Zeng, Y.
et al. Comparative Study of TiO
2 and CdS as the Electron Transport Layer for Sb
2S
3 Solar Cells.
Solar RRL 6, 2200435 (2022).