April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL05.03.01

Atomic Force Microscopy for Routine, Fast and Reliable Defect Quantification in 2D Materials

When and Where

Apr 23, 2024
3:15pm - 3:30pm
Room 344, Level 3, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Matthew Rosenberger1,Kaikui Xu1,Madisen Holbrook2,Yucheng Yang1,Luke Holtzman2,Kristyna Yang1,Abhay Pasupathy2,Katayun Barmak2,James Hone2

University of Notre Dame1,Columbia University2

Abstract

Matthew Rosenberger1,Kaikui Xu1,Madisen Holbrook2,Yucheng Yang1,Luke Holtzman2,Kristyna Yang1,Abhay Pasupathy2,Katayun Barmak2,James Hone2

University of Notre Dame1,Columbia University2
Routine defect characterization is a critical capability for understanding defect-property correlations and optimizing growth of two-dimensional (2D) materials. High throughput optical methods for defect characterization, such as Raman spectroscopy, are useful for graphene, but are insufficiently sensitive to defects in some other 2D materials, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), particularly for defect densities of about 10<sup>12</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup> or less. Typical methods for directly detecting defects at the atomic scale, such as scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), are effective, but they are slow and often require arduous sample preparation. There is a need for 2D material defect characterization techniques that are routine, fast, and reliable. Here, we demonstrate two atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based techniques for locating and quantifying atomic-scale defects in 2D materials. First, we show that conductive AFM can locate and differentiate the same defects as STM by comparing conductive AFM and STM on the same region of a TMD crystal<sup>1</sup>. Our work establishes conductive AFM as a higher-throughput alternative to STM for defect quantification. Second, we show that lateral force microscopy (LFM) can locate atomic-scale defects through a direct comparison of LFM with conductive AFM on a TMD crystal<sup>2</sup>. Importantly, we show that LFM can also identify atomic-scale defects in insulators, such as hexagonal boron nitride, because LFM is a purely mechanical technique. The AFM-based methods presented here enable routine defect characterization, which will facilitate rapid investigations of defect-property relationships and speed up the development of new growth processes.<br/><br/>(1) Xu, K.; Holbrook, M.; Holtzman, L. N.; Pasupathy, A. N.; Barmak, K.; Hone, J. C.; Rosenberger, M. R. Validating the Use of Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy for Defect Quantification in 2D Materials. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (24), 24743–24752. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c05056.<br/><br/>(2) Yang, Y.; Xu, K.; Holtzman, L. N.; Yang, K.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Hone, J. C.; Barmak, K.; Rosenberger, M. R. Atomic Defect Quantification by Lateral Force Microscopy. <i>Under Review.</i>

Keywords

2D materials | scanning probe microscopy (SPM)

Symposium Organizers

Silvija Gradecak, National University of Singapore
Lain-Jong Li, The University of Hong Kong
Iuliana Radu, TSMC Taiwan
John Sudijono, Applied Materials, Inc.

Symposium Support

Gold
Applied Materials

Session Chairs

Kevin O'Brien
Aaron Thean

In this Session