April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting & Exhibit
EL04.07.02

Unraveling the Atomic Mechanism of the Disorder- Order Phase transition from γ-Ga2O3 to β-Ga2O3 by in situ Transmission Electron Microscopy

When and Where

Apr 24, 2024
4:00pm - 4:15pm
Room 345, Level 3, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Martin Albrecht1,Charlotte Wouters1,Musbah Nofal1,Piero Mazzolini2,Jijun Zhang1,Thilo Remmele1,Albert Kwasniewski1,Oliver Bierwagen2

Leibniz Institut fuer Kristallzuechtung1,Paul-Drude-Instit für Festkörperelektronik2

Abstract

Martin Albrecht1,Charlotte Wouters1,Musbah Nofal1,Piero Mazzolini2,Jijun Zhang1,Thilo Remmele1,Albert Kwasniewski1,Oliver Bierwagen2

Leibniz Institut fuer Kristallzuechtung1,Paul-Drude-Instit für Festkörperelektronik2
Monoclinic Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) is a semiconductor with a bandgap of 4.7 eV and an estimated breakdown field strength of 8 MVcm<sup>−1</sup>. It has attracted considerable interest as a promising material for electronic applications such as solar blind UV photodetectors, and high power devices. In addition to the thermodynamically stable monoclinic β-phase, Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> can be stabilized under ambient conditions in a number of metastable structures (α-Ga2O3 , γ-Ga2O3, κ-Ga2O3 and δ-Ga2O3) in which Ga cations exist in both tetrahedral (GaO4) and octahedral (GaO6) coordination. The polymorphic transition between β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3 </sub>has recently attracted particular attention and has become the focus of intense research efforts. These research activities were triggered by the experimental observation that after implantation of Si or Ge, used to selectively n-dope β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3,</sub> a phase transition from β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> to γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was observed. [1,2,3] Recovery of β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was observed after annealing. [1,2] It was also observed that β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is extremely radiation tolerant. Since none of the other crystalline phases were observed to form, the question of a hidden structural relationship between γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was raised.<br/>In this paper we study the reverse direction, i.e. the disorder-order phase transition from amorphous Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> to γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and then to β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> by <i>in situ</i> transmission electron microscopy. The <i>in situ</i> studies are complemented by <i>ex situ</i> annealing experiments, the results of which are analyzed by X-ray diffraction and high resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. Amorphous Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> deposited at 100°C by molecular beam epitaxy crystallizes at 470°C in the γ phase , which undergoes a phase transition to the β phase above 500°C. Between 500° and 900°C we find a mixture of γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and the β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> coexisting. Above 950°C we find only β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Taking into account the crystallographic symmetry relations, we construct a common lattice of both structures containing a common fcc-type sublattice occupied by oxygen atoms, the cation sites of β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> common to both phases, and partially occupied cation sites in the γ-phase corresponding to interstitial sites in the β-phase. We assign the atomic displacements within this lattice that transform γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (the defective spinel structure with partially occupied cation sites) into perfectly ordered β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. By its nature, this is a reconstructive disorder-order phase transition in which atoms exchange positions to the nearest neighbor sites. Few of the exchange processes we derive from crystallographic symmetry relations match those derived by Huang et al. [2,3] from analysis of atomically resolved scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of implanted β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Our results explain, why disordering of the lattice, e.g. by implantation, causes the formation of γ-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and not any of the other phases. This would require a martensitic transition, i.e. shearing of the oxygen sublattice and not simply displacement of cations. It also explains, why annealing causes the reverse phase transition and results in a perfect β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> lattice as described by Huang et al.. [2]<br/><br/>[1] A. Azarov, et al. ,Nature Communications 14, 4855 (2023)<br/>[2] L. Huang, et al. APL Mater. 11, 061113 (2023).<br/>[3] L. Huang et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 251602 (2023),

Keywords

phase transformation | transmission electron microscopy (TEM) | x-ray diffraction (XRD)

Symposium Organizers

Hideki Hirayama, RIKEN
Robert Kaplar, Sandia National Laboratories
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, University of California, Santa Barbara
Matteo Meneghini, University of Padova

Symposium Support

Silver
Taiyo Nippon Sanso

Session Chairs

Sriram Krishnamoorthy
Yuhao Zhang

In this Session