April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)

Event Supporters

2024 MRS Spring Meeting
QT02.09.01

Symmetry-Breaking Pathway towards The Unpinned Broken Helix

When and Where

Apr 25, 2024
1:30pm - 2:00pm
Room 421, Level 4, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Veronika Sunko1,2,Elizabeth Donoway1,2,Thais Trevisan1,2,Alex Liebman - Pelaez1,2,Ryan Day1,2,Kohtaro Yamakawa1,2,Yue Sun1,2,Rafael M. Fernandes3,Jian Rui Soh4,Dharmalingam Prabhakaran5,Andrew Boothroyd5,James Analytis1,2,Joel Moore1,2,Joe Orenstein1,2

UC Berkeley1,Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2,University of Minnesota3,Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne4,University of Oxford5

Abstract

Veronika Sunko1,2,Elizabeth Donoway1,2,Thais Trevisan1,2,Alex Liebman - Pelaez1,2,Ryan Day1,2,Kohtaro Yamakawa1,2,Yue Sun1,2,Rafael M. Fernandes3,Jian Rui Soh4,Dharmalingam Prabhakaran5,Andrew Boothroyd5,James Analytis1,2,Joel Moore1,2,Joe Orenstein1,2

UC Berkeley1,Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory2,University of Minnesota3,Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne4,University of Oxford5
The search for materials exhibiting novel emergent properties relies on identification of their characteristic symmetries. A prominent example are materials in which magnetic symmetries promote topological phases, and consequently quantized responses to external stimuli.<br/><br/>EuIn<sub>2</sub>As<sub>2</sub> attracted attention when ab-initio calculations predicted that it hosts the elusive axion insulator state, based on the assumption of a simple collinear antiferromagnetic structure. Recently, scattering measurements revealed a much more intricate magnetic ground state, characterized by two coexisting magnetic wavevectors, reached by successive thermal phase transitions. The proposed magnetic phases were a spin helix and a state with interpenetrating helical and antiferromagnetic order, termed a `broken helix.' The symmetries of both deduced phases protected the axion state.<br/><br/>In this talk I will show results of magneto-optical experiments which are not compatible with the magnetic structures deduced by scattering. I will further demonstrate how combining the experimental information from scattering and symmetry-sensitive optics with an analysis based on group theory allowed us to uniquely identify the magnetic structure associated with each of the two phases. We find that the higher temperature phase hosts a ‘nodal amplitude-modulated’ structure rather than a helix, characterized by a variation of magnetic moment amplitude from layer to layer, with the moment vanishing entirely in every third Eu layer. The lower temperature structure is similar to the `broken helix,' with one important difference: the relative orientation of the magnetic structure and the lattice is not fixed, resulting in an ‘unpinned broken helix.’ As a result of the consequent breaking of rotational symmetry, the axion phase is not generically protected in EuIn<sub>2</sub>As<sub>2 </sub>but we show that it can be restored if the magnetic structure is tuned with externally applied uniaxial strain. Finally, I will present a spin Hamiltonian that identifies the interactions needed to account for the complex magnetic order in EuIn<sub>2</sub>As<sub>2</sub>, and how they arise from coupling to itinerant degrees of freedom.<br/><br/>Taken together, our results emphasize the power of a multimodal approach combining scattering and symmetry-sensitive optical probes in identifying complex magnetic structures, as well identifying EuIn<sub>2</sub>As<sub>2 </sub>as a remarkably tunable platform for exploration of magnetic symmetries.

Keywords

magnetooptic

Symposium Organizers

Zhong Lin, Binghamton University
Yunqiu Kelly Luo, University of Southern California
Andrew F. May, Oak Ridge National Laboratoryy
Dmitry Ovchinnikov, University of Kansas

Symposium Support

Silver
Thorlabs Bronze
Vacuum Technology Inc.

Session Chairs

Ahmet Avsar
Kyle Seyler

In this Session