April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)

Event Supporters

2024 MRS Spring Meeting
EN10.06.06

Process Optimization of Chemical Vapor Deposition of MAPbBr3 for Optoelectronic Applications

When and Where

Apr 23, 2024
5:00pm - 7:00pm
Flex Hall C, Level 2, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Jona Riedel1,Franziska Muckel2,Michael Heuken1,3,Andrei Vescan1,Holger Kalisch1

RWTH Aachen University1,Universität Duisburg-Essen2,AIXTRON SE3

Abstract

Jona Riedel1,Franziska Muckel2,Michael Heuken1,3,Andrei Vescan1,Holger Kalisch1

RWTH Aachen University1,Universität Duisburg-Essen2,AIXTRON SE3
With growing commercial interest in halide perovskite (HP) thin-film applications, the question which deposition techniques can meet the requirements of industrial scalability and reproducibility becomes increasingly important. At the current time, solution-based methods which are prominent in research are limited to small areas, low reproducibility and are not able to meet special requirements such as deposition on structured substrates. Promising alternatives are vapor-based techniques like vacuum thermal evaporation (VTE) or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) which are well established in the field of semiconductor manufacturing.<br/>At CST (RWTH Aachen University), we have designed and built a custom showerhead-based CVD tool for the deposition of HP thin films by thermal evaporation of halide salts into a heated carrier gas stream. The usage of an inert carrier gas such as N<sub>2</sub> at low vacuum around 5-10 hPa allows for the simultaneous or alternating evaporation of both metal-halide as well as organo-halide salts in a single process. The latter materials are typically difficult to use in high-vacuum techniques like VTE due to their large vapor pressures and low sticking coefficients. In addition, unlike quartz furnace CVD setups found in research literature, our tool features separate sources for different precursor salts. Temperature-controlled substrates are mounted in a heated showerhead-based reactor chamber allowing for uniform deposition on areas up to 100 cm<sup>2</sup>.<br/>While different HP materials have been successfully prepared in our tool, benchmarks for both LEDs and solar cells are lagging behind those of devices based on HP films prepared by spin coating. A typical feature of our CVD films is a reduction of photoluminescence (PL) intensity compared to spin-coated reference samples by 2-3 orders of magnitude. Times-resolved PL spectroscopy indicates the presence of a fast, non-radiative recombination channel in CVD samples absent in their solution-processed counterparts, which likely impedes efficient operation of both LEDs and solar cells. By sequential deposition of PbBr<sub>2</sub> and MABr to form MAPbBr<sub>3</sub> using combinations of CVD and solution deposition, we investigated the influence of both precursors and processes. We observed that spin-coated PbBr<sub>2</sub> layers can be easily converted to MAPbBr<sub>3</sub> layers with strong PL intensity using CVD-MABr, while simultaneously grown CVD-MAPbBr<sub>3</sub> as well as CVD-PbBr<sub>2</sub> films converted by either CVD-MABr or MABr solutions share a low PL intensity. This is in accordance with literature which comprises numerous reports on the conversion of lead-halide precursor films from solution or VTE via MABr-CVD, but lacks reports on the usage of lead halide salts as separate precursors under low vacuum. Unlike reports from high-vacuum evaporation, we observe strong evidence for the dissociation of thermally evaporated PbBr<sub>2</sub>. Notably after prolonged evaporation of PbBr<sub>2</sub> precursor material, metallic residues can be found in the crucible. This indicates an at least partial dissociation of PbBr<sub>2</sub> into elemental Pb and volatile Br<sub>2</sub>. Due to the high vapor pressure of Br<sub>2, </sub>the deposition conditions inside our reactor can be expected to be Br-rich. This could facilitate the formation of intrinsic defects related to excess Br, like Br interstitials, and give a reason for the low PL intensity found when evaporated PbBr<sub>2</sub> is part of the process. Nevertheless, we were able to increase the PL intensity of MAPbBr<sub>3</sub> by 1-2 orders of magnitude by thermal annealing of PbBr<sub>2</sub> precursor layers for up to 3 h at 200-310 °C in N<sub>2</sub>. A similar effect can be observed by increasing the substrate temperature during PbBr<sub>2</sub> deposition from 100 °C to above 200 °C, supporting the assumption of a volatile species like Br poisoning our HP. The combined results show a clear path to directly avoid the suspected negative impact of PbBr<sub>2</sub> dissociation in CVD of HPs.

Keywords

chemical vapor deposition (CVD) (deposition) | luminescence | perovskites

Symposium Organizers

Ivan Mora-Sero, Universitat Jaume I
Michael Saliba, University of Stuttgart
Carolin Sutter-Fella, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Yuanyuan Zhou, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Symposium Support

Silver
Journal of Energy Chemistry

Session Chairs

Carolin Sutter-Fella
Yuanyuan Zhou

In this Session