April 22 - 26, 2024
Seattle, Washington
May 7 - 9, 2024 (Virtual)
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Spring Meeting
EN09.04.08

Electrochemical CO2 Reduction over Nanoparticles derived from an Oxidized Cu–Ni Intermetallic Alloy

When and Where

Apr 23, 2024
5:00pm - 7:00pm
Flex Hall C, Level 2, Summit

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Tomiko Suzuki1,Toshitaka Ishizaki1,Satoru Kosaka1,Naoko Takahashi1,Noritake Isomura1,Juntaro Seki1,Yoriko Matsuoka1,Keiichiro Oh-ishi1,Ayako Oshima1,Kosuke Kitazumi1,Keita Sekizawa1,Takeshi Morikawa1

Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.1

Abstract

Tomiko Suzuki1,Toshitaka Ishizaki1,Satoru Kosaka1,Naoko Takahashi1,Noritake Isomura1,Juntaro Seki1,Yoriko Matsuoka1,Keiichiro Oh-ishi1,Ayako Oshima1,Kosuke Kitazumi1,Keita Sekizawa1,Takeshi Morikawa1

Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.1
Research and development on the electrocatalytic CO<sub>2 </sub>reduction reaction (CO<sub>2</sub>RR) to valuable hydrocarbons and alcohols has attracted great interest because of the potential to produce sustainable fuels. To date, copper (Cu) and Cu-based compounds are the most studied metal electrocatalysts that have demonstrated the ability to convert CO<sub>2</sub> and CO into large amounts of C2 and C3 molecules [1]. Furthermore, studies of Cu particle catalysts have reported that their particle size, crystalline phase, and morphology are highly correlated with C2 selectivity [2]. As one approach to control C2 selectivity on Cu catalysts, the use of Cu-based bimetallic alloys has been reported [3], especially the combination of Cu with CO-producing metal species such as Ag, Au, Zn, and Pd. On the other hand, combinations of Cu with hydrogen-producing elements such as Fe, Ni, and Pt have been reported to improve the activity and selectivity of hydrogen production compared to pure Cu electrodes, making it difficult to improve C2 and C3 activity with these combinations.<br/>In this study, we demonstrate that Ni species have a positive effect on the formation of C2 compounds in the CO<sub>2</sub>RR of Cu-based catalysts. To avoid size-dependent selectivity of copper catalysts, Cu-Ni interatomic alloy NPs (0-83 at% Ni as Ni/(Cu + Ni)) of various compositions with diameters around 10 nm were synthesized by one-pot and two-step synthesis using copper(II) acetylacetonate and nickel(II) chloride [4]. Since these Cu-Ni NPs were easily spontaneously oxidized in air at room temperature, these partially oxidized NPs were loaded onto carbon paper supports and used as electrocatalyst.<br/>The electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> reduction reaction was evaluated using a three-electrode system in a closed batch single-compartment reactor filled with 0.05 M KHCO<sub>3</sub> aqueous solution bubbled with CO<sub>2</sub>. Electrolysis was performed at -1.2 V (vs. RHE) using a catalytic electrode as the working electrode, a Pt wire as the counter electrode, and an Ag/AgCl electrode as the reference electrode. The CuNi-NP was driven as a catalyst for hydrogen production in the early stages of the electrolysis, but activated into an excellent CO<sub>2</sub> reduction catalyst in the subsequent electrolysis. The dependence of the C2 selectivity on the Ni content was investigated using various activated Cu–Ni NPs electrodes. Activated Cu–Ni (3–32 at%-Ni) alloy nanoparticles enhance selectivity for ethylene and ethanol formation over oxide-derived Cu nanoparticles by electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub>RR in aqueous solution. The Cu–Ni (19 at%) NPs exhibited 35% efficiency for C2 and the suppression of H<sub>2</sub> formation down to 9%. These results demonstrate that the addition of Ni to the Cu NPs facilitates C–C bond formation. The activated catalyst consists of metallic Cu, Cu–O, Ni, and Ni–O species, as confirmed by X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements [5].<br/>The present research suggests that further investigation is worthwhile to broaden the possibility of an unprecedented oxide-derived Cu–Ni and other CO<sub>2</sub>RR catalysts.<br/><br/><b>References</b><br/>[1] Y. Hori, et al., <i>Chem. Lett.,</i> (1985) 1695-1698. [2] A. Loiudice, et al., <i>Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,</i> 55 (2016) 5789-5792. [3] S. Nitopi, et al., <i>Chem. Rev.,</i> 119 (2019) 7610-7672. [4] R. Watanabe, T. Ishizaki, <i>J. Mater. Chem. C.,</i> 2 (2014) 3542-3548. [5] T. M. Suzuki, T. Morikawa, et al., <i>Chem. Commun.,</i> 56 (2020) 15008-15011.

Keywords

alloy | nanostructure

Symposium Organizers

Christopher Barile, University of Nevada, Reno
Nathalie Herlin-Boime, CEA Saclay
Michel Trudeau, Concordia University
Edmund Chun Ming Tse, University Hong Kong

Session Chairs

Nathalie Herlin-Boime
Michel Trudeau
Edmund Chun Ming Tse

In this Session