December 1 - 6, 2024
Boston, Massachusetts

Event Supporters

2024 MRS Fall Meeting & Exhibit
EL04.18.43

Interface Effect Between NiOx and Perovskite and Their Impact on Solar Cells—A Comparative Study of Sputtered and Nanoparticle NiOx

When and Where

Dec 5, 2024
8:00pm - 10:00pm
Hynes, Level 1, Hall A

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Hanseul Lee1,2,Hye Ri Jung1,Sooyeon Pak1,3,Sang Hoon Kim1,Seoyeon Ko4,Seokhyun Yoon4,Soohyung Park1,Gee Yeong Kim1

Korea Institute of Science and Technology1,Korea University2,Yonsei University3,Ewha Womans University4

Abstract

Hanseul Lee1,2,Hye Ri Jung1,Sooyeon Pak1,3,Sang Hoon Kim1,Seoyeon Ko4,Seokhyun Yoon4,Soohyung Park1,Gee Yeong Kim1

Korea Institute of Science and Technology1,Korea University2,Yonsei University3,Ewha Womans University4
In perovskite solar cells with inverted structure, Nickel oxide (NiO<sub>x</sub>) has been used as a hole transport layer because of its high chemical stability, excellent energy level alignment with the absorber layer, cost-effectiveness, and ease of fabrication via various deposition methods -spin coating, sputtering, ALD, etc.-. However, NiO<sub>x</sub> can react with the perovskite depending on the valency of nickel ions. Reactants acting as a barrier during hole extraction at the NiO<sub>x</sub>-perovskite interface were provided by the deprotonation of cationic ammonium and oxidation of iodide species. Despite the importance of this interface, a fundamental understanding of the interface effect in NiO<sub>x</sub> and perovskite, especially in terms of device performance, has not been thoroughly explored. In this study, we investigated material properties of two different NiO<sub>x</sub> thin films using nanoparticle NiO<sub>x</sub> precursor (NP NiO<sub>x</sub>) and RF sputtering method (SP NiO<sub>x</sub>) and their effect on interface effect with perovskite, device performance, and stability. In order to elucidate the difference between NP NiO<sub>x</sub> and SP NiO<sub>x</sub>, we investigated the interface of NiO<sub>x</sub>/perovskite by XPS, UPS, Raman, and electrical measurements. These NiO<sub>x</sub> films significantly differed in the Ni<sup>3+</sup>/Ni<sup>2+</sup> ratio, consequently affecting their conductivity. Experimental results showed that large and smooth grains are observed in perovskite on top of SP NiO<sub>x</sub>. Additionally, the interfacial interaction between NiO<sub>x</sub> and perovskite was verified through I-V measurements. The device using SP NiO<sub>x</sub> showed a severe current drop, which means there is severe hole depletion between SP NiO<sub>x</sub> and perovskite but not in NP NiO<sub>x</sub>. To further explain the underlying mechanisms, we performed XPS and UPS measurements on NiO<sub>x</sub>/perovskite samples with varying perovskite thicknesses. The results revealed notable shifts in the energy levels of Pb 4f and I 3d orbitals in SP NiO<sub>x</sub>-based devices, while NP NiO<sub>x</sub>-based devices showed no significant shifts. Also, we identified a unique bonding configuration in NP NiO<sub>x</sub> films, likely formed during the synthesis process, which may help suppress hole depletion at the interface. As a result, NP NiO<sub>x</sub>-based PSCs demonstrated better hole extraction and higher fill factor (FF) compared to SP NiO<sub>x</sub>-based devices. This study suggests an insight into the optimization of NiOx-based HTLs for achieving higher-efficiency PSCs, and the origin of the interface effect between NiO<sub>x</sub> and perovskite.

Keywords

interface

Symposium Organizers

Anita Ho-Baillie, The University of Sydney
Marina Leite, University of California, Davis
Nakita Noel, University of Oxford
Laura Schelhas, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Symposium Support

Bronze
APL Materials

Session Chairs

Rebecca Belisle

In this Session