Dec 3, 2024
10:45am - 11:00am
Sheraton, Third Floor, Huntington
Anna Berseneva1,2,Hanno Loye1
University of South Carolina1,National Renewable Energy Laboratoru2
Anna Berseneva1,2,Hanno Loye1
University of South Carolina1,National Renewable Energy Laboratoru2
Chalcogen environments tend to stabilize low oxidation states, thus making the +5 oxidation state in uranium chalcogenides extremely rare: more than 97% of U-containing chalcogenides have oxidation states of U that do not exceed +4. Having one unpaired electron, the magnetism of U<sup>+5</sup>, 5f<sup>1</sup>, is of significant interest; however, it is underexplored due to a scarcity of examples. This talk arranges around the novel structures of uranium sulfides containing U<sup>+5</sup>: Na<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>5</sub>US<sub>6</sub>, Na<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>US<sub>6</sub>, and Na<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>USe<sub>6</sub>; the impact of the uranium oxidation state on the properties will be highlighted. Firstly, I will discuss synthetic challenges to obtain those materials as well as provide support for the uranium oxidation states <i>via</i> bond valence sum analysis and X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy. Second part of the talk will be focused on the magnetic properties of U<sup>+5</sup>-sulfides. Magnetic studies on powder and single crystal samples revealed that Na<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>5</sub>US<sub>6</sub> is an antiferromagnet (<i>T</i><sub>N</sub> = 4.7 K) with anisotropic magnetic behavior. Moving from the Na<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>5</sub>US<sub>6</sub> framework structure to the related layered Na<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>U<i>Q</i><sub>6</sub> compositions does not change the magnetic behavior, and bulk measurements on the Na<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>U<i>Q</i><sub>6</sub> powder showed that it is an antiferromagnet with <i>T</i><sub>N</sub> of 3.4 K (<i>Q</i> = S) and 5.9 K (<i>Q</i> = Se). The magnetic moments derived from the Curie-Weiss law for both Na<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>5</sub>US<sub>6</sub> and Na<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>4</sub>USe<sub>6</sub> samples were significantly reduced (1.06–1.08 ��<sub>B</sub>) and cannot be described by either the spin-only or the total angular momentum models, highlighting the complexity of the interaction between 5<i>f</i> electrons and the ligands. Such a decrease in the magnetic moment can be explained by the covalency contribution of the U–<i>Q</i> bonding, leading to the changes in the electron density of uranium.