December 1 - 6, 2024
Boston, Massachusetts
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Fall Meeting & Exhibit
EN05.14.03

Tailoring the Active Oxygen Species in the Electrochemical Oxidative Coupling of Methane to Suppress Deep Oxidation

When and Where

Dec 6, 2024
2:30pm - 2:45pm
Hynes, Level 3, Ballroom B

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Filip Grajkowski1,Bill Liu1,Subhash Chandra1,Sanaz Koohfar1,Dongha Kim1,Georgios Dimitrakopoulos1,Bilge Yildiz1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology1

Abstract

Filip Grajkowski1,Bill Liu1,Subhash Chandra1,Sanaz Koohfar1,Dongha Kim1,Georgios Dimitrakopoulos1,Bilge Yildiz1

Massachusetts Institute of Technology1
Ethylene (C2H4) is a crucial industrial product with a broad range of applications such as the manufacturing of plastics. Commercial C2H4 production involves the steam cracking of ethane/naphtha, resulting in ~1.5-3 tonnes of CO2 released for every tonne of C2H4: this makes C2H4 production the second-biggest contributor to industrial CO2 emissions globally. A promising route to low carbon C2H4 production is the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM)1 which can directly convert CH4 into C2H4. Unfortunately, this OCM approach is severely limited by significant “deep oxidation” where CH4 is instead combusted to CO/CO2 and H2O. To improve the C2 (C2H4 and C2H6) selectivity and yield of OCM, recent works have integrated OCM activity into solid oxide electrolyzers. In this electrochemical OCM (EOCM) approach, O2- ions from the cathode are transported to the anode where they oxidise CH4 to yield the desired C2 products. While the initial results are somewhat promising,2 it is unclear what active oxygen species are involved in the activation of CH4 and how these active oxygen species then affect the overall reaction selectivity.

In this work, we first adopt the model titanate-based mixed ionic-electronic conductor La0.3Sr0.7TiO3 (LST30) as an anode material for EOCM. We demonstrate that by coupling the EOCM reactions to oxygen evolution at the anode surface, we can increase the C2 selectivity of the system by >3x relative to the baseline performance of LST30. We rationalize this observation by hypothesizing that the oxygen intermediates produced as part of the oxygen evolution reaction are also OCM-active and therefore enable the selective oxidation of CH4 into C2 products. We can thus utilize this insight into the nature of the OCM-active oxygen species to further tune the reaction selectivity. Since it is known that the OCM selectivity is limited by deleterious reactions of C2H4 with the surface oxygen species,3 herein we attempt to suppress these reactions by changing the surface binding strength of these oxygen species. We use the well-established O 2p-band model for oxides4 to tune the oxygen binding strength: doping SrTiO3 with Ta to form SrTi1-xTaxO3 can therefore allow us to monotonically shift the O 2p-band down and thus increase the oxygen binding strength. By exploring this family of materials, we demonstrate that the C2H4/C2H6 ratio can be significantly manipulated along this series, highlighting that the oxygen binding strength changes the relative rates of the C2 oxidation reactions. To complement this, we utilize ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations and we confirm that the binding strengths of the active oxygen species can be significantly increased using Ta-doping, providing a materials-based approach towards altering the selectivity of the EOCM process. Overall, our general materials design strategy enables us to target electrode surfaces with optimal oxygen binding strengths to favor CH4 activation while also suppressing the deep oxidation reactions, providing a pathway towards EOCM systems with enhanced C2 selectivity.

(1) Keller, G. E.; Bhasin, M. M. Synthesis of ethylene via oxidative coupling of methane: I. Determination of active catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 1982, 73 (1), 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(82)90075-6.
(2) Zhu, C.; Hou, S.; Hu, X.; Lu, J.; Chen, F.; Xie, K. Electrochemical conversion of methane to ethylene in a solid oxide electrolyzer. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1), 1173. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09083-3.
(3) Su, Y. S.; Ying, J. Y.; Green, W. H. Upper bound on the yield for oxidative coupling of methane. Journal of Catalysis 2003, 218 (2), 321-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00043-5.
(4) Giordano, L.; Akkiraju, K.; Jacobs, R.; Vivona, D.; Morgan, D.; Shao-Horn, Y. Electronic Structure-Based Descriptors for Oxide Properties and Functions. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (3), 298-308. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00509.

Keywords

ceramic | reactivity | surface chemistry

Symposium Organizers

Alexander Giovannitti, Chalmers University of Technology
Joakim Halldin Stenlid, KBR Inc., NASA Ames Research Center
Helena Lundberg, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Germán Salazar Alvarez, Uppsala University

Session Chairs

Alexander Giovannitti
Helena Lundberg

In this Session