December 1 - 6, 2024
Boston, Massachusetts
Symposium Supporters
2024 MRS Fall Meeting & Exhibit
MT01.02.05

Effect of Stress, Temperature and Langevin Friction on the Rate of Reaction in Dislocation Dipoles

When and Where

Dec 3, 2024
3:00pm - 3:15pm
Hynes, Level 2, Room 205

Presenter(s)

Co-Author(s)

Mohammadhossein Nahavandian1,Liam Myhill1,Soumit Sarkar1,Nikhil Chandra Admal2,Giacomo Po3,Enrique Martinez1

Clemson University1,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign2,University of Miami3

Abstract

Mohammadhossein Nahavandian1,Liam Myhill1,Soumit Sarkar1,Nikhil Chandra Admal2,Giacomo Po3,Enrique Martinez1

Clemson University1,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign2,University of Miami3
Thermal activation of dislocations is critical to predict the mechanical response of materials under common experimental conditions. According to transition state theory (TST), the rate for the system to overcome free energy barriers is a function of an attempt frequency, activation free energy, and temperature. Using Molecular Dynamics (MD), we have computed the power spectrum of a dislocation dipole at different temperatures to relate it to the attempt frequency. For small Langevin frictions, the power spectrum remains the same, but if the friction is strong, there is a change in the power spectrum. We have also computed the rates from MD, both dynamically and statically. Dynamically, we observed a strong dependence on the Langevin friction. As the friction becomes weaker, the rate increases, and we observe an increase in the number of correlated events. Statically, we computed the minimum energy path and activation free energy relying on Schoeck’s formalism to compute the activation entropy and observed a significant entropic effect. We have also extended the equations of motion in Dislocation Dynamics (DD) to add stochastic forces, and we have computed the rates for similar configurations and compared them with MD results. We have analyzed the effect of discretization of the dislocation in the results for different temperatures and applied stresses. We discuss here the agreements and differences between the two methods, MD and DD.

Keywords

thermodynamics

Symposium Organizers

MIkko Alava, NOMATEN Center of Excellence
Joern Davidsen, University of Calgary
Kamran Karimi, National Center for Nuclear Research
Enrique Martinez, Clemson University

Session Chairs

Nithin Mathew
Thomas Swinburne

In this Session